Is it part of a capitalist conspiracy to stop us learning we're really in the Matrix?
2007-11-25 17:44:16 · 11 answers · asked by The Thing Is 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Edit: Some people have replied that is posted in the 'Philosophy' section but that can't be right because there is no 'Philosophy' section on Yahoo Answers. Also there is no need to be aggressive and someone spelled 'elicit' as 'illicit', as in 'illicit' drugs.
Yahoo is part of a capitalist corporation, is it possible it's trying to silence voices like those of Noam Chomsky?
2007-11-25 18:12:44 · update #1
Thank God you think so..... I have been rather uncomfortable all the time that I have been credited with the top contributor tag in this section here, because the truth is that I am no philosopher by a long long margin. This section is such a mixture of various types that it should be titled "Sundries". Over here, indeed one can unlearn any philosophy one has learned.
2007-11-25 19:14:55 · answer #1 · answered by small 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Apparently there are those who don't think so. It is believed that the title is a misnomer! It should have been entitled " Your Very Own Opinion", there would be more truth to that. As for the conspiracy theory? SHUT UP MAN!!! What do you want to advertise that for? Everybody will find out and life as we know it will go into a tailspin. STOP ROCKING THE BOAT.
Thank-you for your question but please, do not let on about the truth in this godforsaken matrix ....okay?
Good, now go find another question to illicit some more opinions.
2007-11-26 01:54:51 · answer #2 · answered by the old dog 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There's an "international capitalist-communist conspiracy" which exists at inner levels and is leading toward a one-world global luciferian superstate, aka "matrix."
"The Soulless One," Mark Prophet is worth looking into, as is Ted Flynn's "Hope of the Wicked."
kind regards,
j.
2007-11-26 01:50:28 · answer #3 · answered by j153e 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is utter nonsense. Not only are you aware that you are plugged into the Matrix, you enjoy it enough to discuss it.
2007-11-26 02:28:31 · answer #4 · answered by Less is Less 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If there is no 'Philosophy' section, how did this question get in it? We must really be in the 'Paranormal' section.
Or maybe the 'Twilight Zone!' doo doo DOO doo - doo doo DOO doo
2007-11-26 01:55:46 · answer #5 · answered by Zee 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
You are in the philosophy section. Whats the point of this post... you only prove your own stupidity and make yourself look foolish.
===
This is the philosophy section,... you moron. Explain why it isnt.
"It cant be because it isnt" is the most retarded statement that Ive ever heard... even from real retards.
I seriously am putting you on my ignore list.
Go fuch yourself
2007-11-26 01:53:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Who is more ignorant, the person who asks the question or the one who answers it?
2007-11-26 03:40:21 · answer #7 · answered by amiaigner 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is one.
2007-11-26 01:52:25 · answer #8 · answered by AMe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you posted this question in the philosophy section.
Home>Arts&Humanities>Philosophy
2007-11-26 01:52:56 · answer #9 · answered by Just me again ☺ 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Does "waste of bandwidth" mean anything to you? :)~
2007-11-26 01:58:00 · answer #10 · answered by Trina™ 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋