2007-11-25 14:34:57 · 13 answers · asked by . 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's not like he's up for re-election or anything!
2007-11-25 14:35:30 · update #1
LOL
You first must understand the thought process of a neo-con. Neo-cons require the pretense, for the pretense is the anchor to their altered version of reality. Without the anchor, they would be forced to turn off their irrational imaginations, and come face-to-face with the horrible consequences that so many have suffered as a direct result of their actions.
2007-11-25 14:37:29 · answer #1 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Those were the first orders.
If he does that now he will look guilty to Americans who still support him and his only chance to make a legacy for himself.
Maybe he is concerned for his safety and well being since he will probably be confined to live here in the US.
Plus there won't be enough troops to guard the oil fields against an Iraqi army that would form very quickly.
2007-11-25 22:45:01 · answer #2 · answered by Enigma 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why would a Texas oilman and the former head of Halliburton care about oil?
Seems like some bizarre conspiracy theory to suggest that people who got their wealth from oil would want to secure Iraqi oil fields. Crazy.
Rich, you are so far gone it amuses me. lol
2007-11-25 22:50:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Iraqui oil has nothing to do with our involvement there, among other reasons because Iraqui oil accounts for a very small percentage of the world's oil reserves. Whatever your feelings about our involvement in Iraq, it has nothing to do with oil. That's a myth generated by people who want to make the President's motives seem evil. I don't agree with a lot of what has happened, but I don't believe for a second that the President gives two cents for the oil fields - they just aren't that important compared to the rest of the world.
2007-11-25 22:39:26 · answer #4 · answered by Rich 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
gosh, i thought that is just what he did. we have over a hundred thousand guys there guarding the oil fields.
2007-11-25 22:53:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
this is really good...
the first place we went upon getting there was to get the oil and convert the oil exchanges to dollars rather than euros which cost the iraqis money
2007-11-25 22:40:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
because there is no pretense, al qaeda isnt about oil and therefore there is nothing to cut. now give it a rest and go back to pelosi for more marching orders. this ones getting real real old.
2007-11-25 22:43:50 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Is that before or after he unleshes his wet dream of destruction on IRAN?& oil goes up to say 150 a barrel..
2007-11-25 22:40:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
You answered your own question. It must not be so much about oil if he hasn't done it to this point.
2007-11-25 23:20:29 · answer #9 · answered by jamazing41 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well since he isnt up for re election maybe that should tell you that it is not all about oil.
2007-11-25 22:39:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋