2007-11-25 13:28:52 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Where do you draw the line between convert and overt tyranny?
2007-11-25 13:32:07 · update #1
hagar22 I have forwarded your answer ...............to the powers that be.
Your answer was pure hate,and in no way addressed my question.
2007-11-25 13:45:59 · update #2
We should not be willing to give up any of our civil liberties. The more we give up, the more at risk we will be from the boogie man. Bush is more of a boogie man than any terrorist.
2007-11-25 13:34:38 · answer #1 · answered by lcmcpa 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
Most people will say give up none, however the truth is we don't know how many of our rights are already being...shall we say, suspended, because of the threat of terrorism. Our government could come and remove any of us at any time and we would be guilty unless we had ironclad proof we weren't terrorists. They could hold any of us incommunicado, in secret and without any legal advice. I don't know what you call that but I call it a severe loss of my rights. Cheers, I'm off to read the Patriot Act again and meditate that god continues to guide the hand of my President.
2007-11-25 13:50:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
NONE..we THE USA will not give up anything just to please a (The boogie man) other wise we will end up giving up little bit of things at a time and then Boom..were in a wacked country so here we are in the USA free as ever and that si what makes the other countries so mad at us..because we can say "I don't like this president" etc ( which is not true I like George Bush) anyway if I were in a country like Iraq when saddam was around and said "I don't like him" I would be dead the next day
2007-11-25 13:33:47 · answer #3 · answered by Gina 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
We should not give up any civil liberties. With the amendments of the patriot act. That just gives the federal government the green light to snoop into our l personal lives.
2007-11-25 19:09:30 · answer #4 · answered by Tammy P 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NONE - Dammit!
Give up ONE and the terrorists win.
Who was the genius that invented the assinine idea that we can protect our freedom by giving some of it up?
I can't think of ANY other situation where people would honestly consider giving up part of something they had to protect the rest of it. (like oh say) - a farmer decides to keep the wolves and coyotes and foxes out of his chicken coop by tying up a chicken outside the fence... what's he going to use tommorrow, another chicken?
Or how about you leave one of your cars parked out on the street tonight with the keys in it so nobody will steal the other one? Or - why don't you leave your Big Screen TV out in the front yard tonight so nobody breaks in to steal your computer?
See? it's TOTAL BS, why does ANYBODY fall for it?????
2007-11-25 13:36:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
None! I believe that we can fight terrorism entirely within the framework of our Constitution and our Laws as already existed before those cowardly individuals hijacked those four airplanes on September 11, 2001.
2007-11-25 13:35:32 · answer #6 · answered by robertcfranklin 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I don't believe I've given up any except waiting in line a little longer at the airport.
2007-11-25 13:34:10 · answer #7 · answered by 1st Buzie 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Bush has already scrapped the Constitution. There really aren't many liberties left.
2007-11-25 13:39:57 · answer #8 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
What civil liberties have you given up, or even asked to give up?
2007-11-25 13:41:43 · answer #9 · answered by Cecil n 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
What ever it takes to keep my grandchildren safe from the people that would allow terrorism to come to our shores.
2007-11-25 13:36:53 · answer #10 · answered by Ronboy 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋