English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am starting a line of belts for women. They will have the logo prominently displayed on them.

Do I need a trademark or do I need a copyright? The United States Patent and Trademark Office Web site is not exactly easy to navigate through.

Does anyone know the answer to this question?

2007-11-25 11:44:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance Other - Business & Finance

10 answers

You would trademark a brand and copyright a work product.

2007-11-25 11:47:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Copyright is the RIGHT OF OWNING A COPY (written document, novel, etc.). A Registered Trademark is the RIGHT OF OWNING a symbol that represents something (belts, cars, fashions, etc). The third is a PATENT which makes an idea YOUR POSSESSION by registering it as your ORIGINAL idea which can be made and sold with ONLY YOU making the profits. Good luck. I strongly recommend getting with lawyers.com and finding someone who can clue you in on what all is required to PATENT your invention. I am assuming your line of belts is unique and warrants a PATENT so that I don't come along and COPY it then call it MINE. Right? Look at history. Case in point: Alexander Graham Bell. He was NOT the inventor of the telephone, he was the FIRST to patent it. The poor chap in England went without the fame and fortune. Learn from history!

2007-11-25 11:57:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Trademark is the way to go. A copyright would be hard to enforce on a belt design but if you begin trademarking your product, it's yours from the first day.

2007-11-25 11:50:44 · answer #3 · answered by CiCi 5 · 0 0

Any title mark or descriptive mark or logo as you have noted requires a trademark protection. If not tradmark infringment is noted upon application you will literally own any and all of the benifits(and problems) associated with it...for another to make ,say, a blue belt just like yours as a knock off is copyright infringent if they put your logo on it they have crossed both boundaries......There ya go from the E...

2007-11-25 11:53:00 · answer #4 · answered by Edesigner 6 · 0 0

A trademark is a representation of your business or product. It cannot be used by anyone else if granted. A copyright is used to protect written works such as literature or music - you need a trademark

2007-11-25 11:49:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Maybe both. Your logo is your trademark and should be copyrighted

2007-11-25 11:49:07 · answer #6 · answered by Patti_Ja 5 · 0 0

A logo is trademarked.

2007-11-25 11:47:14 · answer #7 · answered by Dan H 7 · 0 0

logo = trademarked

2007-11-25 11:48:07 · answer #8 · answered by nickles12 2 · 0 0

in assessment to copyrights, logos are basically created via application, and being nicely-time-honored does not directly qualify a man or woman for risk-free practices. in certainty, Sarah Palin grew to become into in simple terms denied and President Obama grew to become into those days disenchanted via his photograph getting used to sell jackets. nonetheless, those human beings probably have plenty additional money than you and could make lifestyles puzzling for the duration of the judicial gadget regardless of in the event that they have not have been given any actual legal status. because you have plenty potential for drawing their wrath, you're able to desire to consulate an indicator lawyer, noticeably because those apps are quite new and the prospect of hitting it massive remains a actual probability.

2016-10-09 11:47:05 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think a copyright is for written material.

2007-11-25 11:48:11 · answer #10 · answered by MyMxboys is an *old bag too* 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers