NO
2007-11-25 08:21:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dyablo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What up photograph voltaic, i think of it can be a solid %.-up. you opt for a competent 2nd scoring determination because of the fact of Lamar Odom's inconsitency on offense. in spite of the shown fact that, i think of that Webber is a sprint lacking on protection. choosing up Webber will enable the Lakers to commerce away Kwame Brown (they have been attempting to commerce him till now the Bynum harm). they only ought to take care of because of the fact Chris Mihm would be decrease back in 2 weeks and between him and Ronny Turiaf they would be very servicable whilst Drew gets decrease back. With Webber, Odom will become a solid third determination and on nights whilst he can't furnish- you nevertheless have Fisher, Farmar, Crittenton, Radmanovich, so if a sort of fellows steps up you have a continuing huge 3. in spite of the shown fact that defensively PJ Brown might desire to be nicer than Webber in spite of the shown fact that it may be impressive to get the two and commerce Kwame Brown away. pass Lakers!!! Nickster playstation : i think of we've a solid shot because of the fact the Pistons additionally contacted Webber yet mentioned he could be their fourth huge guy. If Webber comes decrease back this is needless to say to win a hoop- and that i think of he may be leap-shooter (15-18 ft) in the Triangle and is a solid passing huge guy- that could supply Luke a pair of layups each and each interest- giving the Lakers probably yet another double digit scorer. pass Lakers!!! Nickster
2016-12-10 05:50:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although the Triangle Offense gets all the press, Phil Jackson really preaches defense.
Defense was never really Webber's strength, and with his age and knees, I don't see him suddenly becoming a defensive stalwart. In 30 minutes a game last season with the defensive-minded Pistons, he averaged fewer than 7 Reb and 1 block (0.6 blocks to be exact) per game.
The Pistons, whose system he already knew, didn't invite him back this year.
Bryant apparently hasn't asked for him -- if he had, they would sign up.
And as another poster mentioned, the Lakers aren't getting through right now with a tweak like that.
So all tolled, I don't see a reason for the Lakers to make that move.
2007-11-25 08:31:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by shp.jc 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
every coach has tried to get webber to play down low
but he's a wannabe point gaurd at heart...only if phil
can make him play big (and stop the behind the back passes)
2007-11-25 08:32:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No they shouldn't, because they aren't going anywhere in the division until Steve Nash ages.
2007-11-25 08:22:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by rath 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They got enough big scrubs down there, they really don't need another washed up forward with bad knees.
2007-11-25 08:23:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by WestCoastin4Life 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No! The guy is old and his performance is not that good. He should take a HIKE! and get out the NBA.
2007-11-25 08:26:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by OUTLAW J 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
no..webber is not in his prime anymore and he doesn't seem right for the lakers
2007-11-25 08:23:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by kobe8bryant4ever 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
For what, bartender? He's toast. Sacremento was his best shot.
2007-11-25 12:26:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Gerry S 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2007-11-25 08:21:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋