English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This was on a test and I got the question wrong so now I have to go back and fix it on my corrections page! Can yal help me find the answer??

2007-11-25 07:27:18 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Alternative Other - Alternative

5 answers

By partially cutting through the internal supports. Then they would place explosive charges in each cut area. Then each explosive would be set off in a sequence that would allow more internal force to be generated inwardly, thus allowing the entire structure to fall in on itself.

2007-11-25 07:40:20 · answer #1 · answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6 · 0 0

the ingredient i come across maximum suspicious - greater so than the *seen* squib explosions; greater so than the places of work being cleared out the weekend ahead of the fall down; greater so than the memories of all of the firemen, policemen and witnesses (or perhaps all of that interior of reason persuasive) - is that the BBC *suggested* that WTC 7 had collapsed on a similar time because it substitute into nonetheless standig interior the history. The stay satellite tv for pc feed with ease vanished interior of a couple of minutes, and the BBC have because of the fact that claimed they have misplaced the tape of it - "through cock-up, no longer conspiracy." Is that even possible? fortuitously others stored it and uploaded it, so which you would be able to all see it for ourselves. a lot of documetaries obtainable; a lot of rebuttals and a lot of scientists and chemical engineers on the two components giving diametrically opposing comments on the comparable documents... yet there is relatively no rebuttal for the reality that the BBC knew it substitute into gonna fall down, an entire 20 minutes before it did. it is the main damning piece of information, because of the fact it substitute into so accidental. it is like somebody mis-study the memo, or according to danger the ink on the fax have been given smudged, and that they made a enormous mistake by danger, panicked, then compounded it with the help of attempting to conceal all of it up. So, yeah, i do no longer think of it is so user-friendly as "Dubya is ebil and the gubmint doned it" yet imo they have been controlled demolitions.

2016-11-12 19:15:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Gut building down to steel beams and frame
Do preliminary cuts
Set charges
As the charges complete the cut on the beams the weight of the building makes it collapse (ie internal forces)

For more information on demolition experts and demolition go to Dallas Contracting Co., Inc. (website http://www.dallascontracting.com )

2007-11-25 23:59:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Internal forces? I don't know what is meant by this. If I were to demolish a building I would collapse the support structure and make gravity pull it down.

2007-11-26 04:03:56 · answer #4 · answered by Peter D 7 · 0 0

It is called............. IMPLOSION

2007-11-25 12:22:24 · answer #5 · answered by pip 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers