Use one of the most inefficent methods to help deliver their message?..I refer to newspapers that use millions of trees worth of paper each year,burn tons and tons of fuel to deliver the papers to the newsstands and homes and burn untold kilowatts of electricity to print the papers?..doesnt this stirke anyone as the ultimate in waste?..something akin to Algore flying around on a private jet and buring a kilowatt of electricity a second at his estate?...
2007-11-25 07:26:11 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I saw a report on how much energy and trees is used on printing one days worth of newspapers...its tremendous...
2007-11-25 07:36:06 · update #1
Why cant the man who invented the internet use that medium to deliver his message?...the newspapers isnt "the only way" to get it out..and the fact that"they will be printed anyway" doesnt wash either...newspapers need to be done away with anyway..they are a failing system
2007-11-25 07:39:20 · update #2
Rules Rules Rules...they dont need no stinkin rules....like algore..they do what they want and then try to tell everyone else what THEY can do....its all hype anyway
2007-11-25 07:30:57 · answer #1 · answered by Dr Sardonicus 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because it isn't about Global Warming, it's about money and taking away our constitutional rights. Al Gore owns a business that makes money off of carbon offsets that do nothing in the long run. Al Gore is only about money as well as everyone else who preaches the same. In my National Geographic, scientists preaching global warming were doing their research whilest riding around on snow mobiles and airplanes. Makes you wonder why people would listen to people who don't practice what they preach.
2007-11-25 07:30:59 · answer #2 · answered by krazycatlady420 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Well those newspapers are going to be delivered regardless, so I don't really why it matters.
Let's say an SUV with horrible gas mileage was already going somewhere, and you had the choice to either hop on board to go to your destination, OR choose a energy-efficient vehicle that wasn't as likely to get there (let's say something was wrong with it...), which one would you choose?
I would choose the SUV because it's already going there. :)
2007-11-25 07:36:21 · answer #3 · answered by jamie68117 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
They are hypocrites of the lowest order..the rules dont apply to them...only everyone else
2007-11-25 07:28:40 · answer #4 · answered by Bushrod 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
YEAH!!!!!
and them thar dang durn GRAVITY ADVOCATES!
thair just is bayd!
I mean cn any of them thar high faluting (wat with their new fangled fancy proper grammer and wotnot) skientists aktually pruve any of it'n?
i thot not!
2007-11-25 08:58:24 · answer #5 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
it is the only delivery system available.
2007-11-25 07:36:26 · answer #6 · answered by ati-atihan 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋