2007-11-25 07:13:44 · 15 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The right side>> haahaaahhaaa. I love it
2007-11-25 07:53:55 · update #1
I could see the Clinton's on the Jerry Springer Show but I don't see him hosting the debates.
2007-11-25 07:31:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The purpose of the debates is so we can see and hear all these people and so decide who we want to vote for.
If you want to watch fights and wrestling and such, there are lots of shows that have them -- try the sports channel or "reality" shows.
Those of us who actually have brains don't watch debates because they're "lively" but because we want to understand who the candidates are and what they stand for.
Also, please never vote. Do the country a big favor.
2007-11-25 15:48:21 · answer #2 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
good idea. isn't really fair that the person hosting the debate is always smarter than the ones debating! we need to mix it up a little.
2007-11-25 15:24:41 · answer #3 · answered by Steve M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't hurt if one of Jerry's whores wrote Hillary's answers to her planted questions either. Most of those drug addicted trailer bums are better spoken than her.
2007-11-25 15:24:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I was under the impression he was hosting the democrat debates.
2007-11-25 16:49:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think the audience watching the debates would skyrocket. I know I would watch just to see the catfights between the candidates
2007-11-25 15:19:28 · answer #6 · answered by xg6 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That isn't a bad idea. Next they can take away the podium and give all the candidates boxing gloves.
2007-11-25 15:22:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jerry Springer should be incarcerated for insighting and empowering the chronically stupid.
2007-11-25 15:21:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, Steven Colbert or Jon Stewart. Then I would feel sorry for the candidates. But it will force them to think on their feet.
2007-11-25 15:19:23 · answer #9 · answered by Mitchell 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I propose that we have a "Cage Match": last one standing gets the Presidency!
2007-11-25 15:24:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋