2007-11-25 04:49:39 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. Both of those people are liberal socialists, especially Hillary. Obama flounders in discussions. Both are dysfunctional and not qualified to be president.
Only simpletons would believe in these ridiculous health care plans - the same sorts of people who would fall for Intenet scams.
2007-11-25 04:55:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Obama just recently released a more detailed release of his Healthcare plan. Personally i don't think a universal healthcare resolution is something we will ever see. There will always be millions of citizens with no health insurance.
They're just trying to play the right cards to get the votes.
2007-11-25 05:04:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
there is not any stable healthcare plan in any of the popular applicants. they relatively desire to pay interest on fixing issues interior the medical marketplace in the previous they attempt to tension government bloat and harm small business enterprise in u.s.. there is not any transparency interior the present healthcare gadget, as a effect making it a particular case interior the yankee economy. It opens the door to quite a few shady dealings in any respect ends. the clarification it is that this way has lots to do with the litigious nature of the time-honored populous and the individuals in touch interior the medical marketplace responding through doing in spite of they might to hide their asses extremely of offering stable healthcare. edit: based on univee, the healthcare companies at the instant are not those making the money in healthcare. the individuals who income are the assurance companies (wellbeing and malpractice), legal specialists, facility vendors, pharmaceutical companies. there is not any authentic duty interior the present gadget by using actuality that those entities have grown so stable that they've an unwieldy volume of lobbying skill. that's additionally concerning the reality that the politicians in Washington at the instant are not likely held responsible for the "crimson meat" they tack on at each and every assembly. it is the character of a representative democracy. you're able to argue that it drives marketplace and creates jobs for the individuals, and changing such an ingrained area of yank politics might harm the entrepreneurial spirit of u.s.. it is a slippery slope, as you will possibly in no way have the invoice Gates and Warren Buffets of the international in international places like Sweden. Greed and necessity are the only issues that motivates human beings to objective greater good and gain their desires. edit2: To spareo1, the respond is particularly relatively common. In international places with working prevalent healthcare fashions, there is transparency interior the medical marketplace by using fact the government runs the gadget extremely of companies searching for income, and the tax rates in those international places are relatively severe. The question is in spite of if or no longer you will possibly choose that for the period of u.s.. larger taxes chases away enormous business enterprise, meaning human beings lose jobs. government run courses mean there will be greater inefficiency as there is not any reward for being greater effective. it is a great photograph question.
2016-10-18 02:10:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, actually it is the best out of all of them. It covers all citizens, instead of leaving out approximately 15 million as Obama's plan does. And it provides incentives for small business and pharmaceutical companies to entice them to support it instead of lobbying against it.
As a point of interest, did you know that in forming her current plan Hillary used the skeleton of the Republican Universal Health Care Plan from the 1990's? Yep, they were for it before they were against it, and funny, none of them were calling it socialism back then.
2007-11-25 05:57:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
She likes the Bush Plan
It is Health Insurance Law not Health Care
2007-11-25 05:20:57 · answer #5 · answered by whirling W dervish 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Based on her past work as Chair of hubby's commission No. Now she refuses to present plan because she doesn't want to antagonize Republicans, She is too conservative
2007-11-25 05:02:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. The people from the countries with socialized medicine wish that they could come to the US for treatment.
It seems that all of the Democratic candidates want some form of socialized medicine.
2007-11-25 04:55:55 · answer #7 · answered by nowyouknow 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Only if you enjoy long lines for basic care and taxes out the wazoo
2007-11-25 04:52:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Nope, both plans are disastrous, as are the candidates themselves.
2007-11-25 05:06:50 · answer #9 · answered by Freethinker 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No.
2007-11-25 04:57:21 · answer #10 · answered by zombi86 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋