They know the majority hates what Bush has done to our country. They hate his constant sociopathic, non-stop lying. The Dems know how bad our country is because of what Bush has done, and yet it appears that they would rather have our country and our middle class be destroyed that confront Bush and get him and his stupid vice along with all their Nazi agents out and into prisons and restore our constitution and our country. If they are as bad and corrupt as the Repukes, then our country has no chance of surviving, and somehow Americans have got to go over both parties and do what Jefferson said to do, every 20 years clean out the entire mess and create another government.
2007-11-25 04:02:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
i have no idea
2007-11-25 04:07:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Not enough votes and he's a lame duck anyway.
It would be rather pointless unless Bush did something truly maniacal.
Besides, I'd like to think that the Democrats, having witnessed the disgusting attempt to impeach Clinton, and the subsequent harm this did to America abroad and domestically, would hesitate to re-create those adverse effects again on the American nation.
Perhaps that is too noble an idea for politics, but I'd like to think that next time impeachment would be carried out for something meangingful, not to try and reverse an election.
2007-11-25 04:15:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
To be impeached, Bush would have to conduct an adulterous sexual dalliance with another consenting adult.
It's not an impeachable offense to lie to Congress, hoodwink a grief-stricken American public, and con our valiant U.S. troops into believing there was honorable purpose in unconstitutionally, illegally, unjustifiably, and immorally invading another soveriegn nation that in no way threatened, provoked or attacked the United States, just so a handful of wealthy elitists, oil barons, industrialists and power brokers could become wealthier and more powerful. -RKO- 11/25/07
2007-11-25 05:15:39 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, just little problem.
He hasn't committed an impeachable offense.
Now, I know that doesn't sit well with the anti war faction, but since there is no crime and Pelosi knows it, she is doing all she can to keep beating back the nut roots who don't have a clue about the Constitution.
I loved Kucinich's try earlier this month. The GOP actually voted FOR the measure, just to bring about debate. The Lib leadership, ( bless their little hearts) were smart enough to know that there was no substance to it, and had the measure sent to the Judicial committee, to die a quick death.
So, all you far left loons, I hope you DO still try to keep bringing this measure up; you only look more and more ridiculous every time.
2007-11-25 04:38:06 · answer #4 · answered by Mark A 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because nobody likes impeachment. Remember when the Republicans impeached Pres. Clinton for a personal issue? It would only further divide this country. And I am a Democrat.
2007-11-25 04:11:18 · answer #5 · answered by cmomma 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
They're waiting to get dick impeached first! Where is he anyway? As he skipped the country yet or is he just hiding out in the bunker?
2007-11-25 04:58:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just wondering here, what if Pres. Bush actually WAS impeached, that would make Chaney Pres. Would that be better?
2007-11-25 04:09:16 · answer #7 · answered by charfan9 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋