10-6, if he got injured for the rest of the season today.
7-9, if he was injured for the entire 16 games of the season.
2007-11-25 03:23:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Without Brady they lose 3 games, don't make it to the sb.
Without Brady they're a slightly above average team. Brady is even responsible for the rest of the team being great. He never talks about his accomplishments, records, record runs, he always gives the defense, line, running backs, and receivers all the credit. Tom saw to it that his linemen got a spot in a commercial. He's playing the egos of the receivers like a violini. I think he's responsible for the revamping of the receiving corps, I think he went to management and told them to get him some receivers, and they did.
Tom Brady is the greatest football player of all time, on so many levels.
2007-11-25 07:21:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Brady had missed this entire season...I think the Pats would still win at least 10 games. It would take a few games for Cassel to get his feet wet...but after that the Pats would continue on and be a SB contender again.
The Pats are certainly a better team with Brady at the helm...but would still be a very good team without Brady. I thought the same thing about Warner and the Rams.
2007-11-25 03:30:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Fantasy Sports Icon 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
If Tom Brady was not at the helm of the Patriots, the Patriots record would be 7-3 at best.
2007-11-25 04:09:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by nancelyn 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Without brady all season 11-5. 14-2 if he was out rest of season The coach has a backup plan i'm sure.
If chicago made the NFL championship game with Grossman
last year, how could the Pats fair any worse, THINK about it people.
2007-11-25 03:45:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Brady Crew 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tom Brady is somewhat of $hit.... i'm satisfied the Patriots (aka the cheaters) are there this three hundred and sixty 5 days. and that i desire Tom Brady continues to be out of the NFL...inclusive of his cry toddler a$$. when they lost to the Giants, Belichick did not even shake Coughlin's hand. What a douche! Then, all of them boycotted the pro Bowl. they're a group of sore losers and Tom Brady is the chief of those losers.
2016-10-25 01:18:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
From where I'm sitting on a Sunday morning, if they lost Brady right now, they still beat Philly, lost to Pittsburgh and the Giants. Post season, they get their bye (obviously) and off the top of my head I would think Jags play Pats tough game, but pull out and then lost to Colts in the championship. But your guess is really just as good as mine. To answer your question though- 15-3.
2007-11-25 03:33:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by riddler_85 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Cassell is not Brady...but Cassell is not bad as the backup...They'd go 12-4 maybe...Still well within the playoffs...Remember there was a time in 2001 when people were saying "Brady is not Bledsoe"...I guess that worked out pretty well...*L*...
2007-11-25 04:09:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Terry C. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Matt Cassel is up to the task as QB but as everyone knows he is not a Tom Brady yet.They would not go undefeated but still could make it to the SB.
Matt is a work in progress.
2007-11-25 03:27:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pat 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
When Bledsoe went out, I hoped he would come back quickly. After all Brady is a sixth round draft pick. To answer your question they'd be 15-1 losing to Pittsburgh.
2007-11-25 03:55:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by doug 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it definitely be struggle for the pats,but they would run alot more and take some pressure of of Cassel. I still think they could pull off a 5 and 1 record the rest of the way.
2007-11-25 03:31:36
·
answer #11
·
answered by bgmcfn 5
·
1⤊
0⤋