It will be a very hard Christmas for them.
Them and 10000000000000000000 other people in the world.
They have to make Xmas extra special this year for the twins,who have lost a sister and will feel the loss very hard on Christmas morning.
My friend lost her husband 7 years ago,on Christmas eve,he was 36. They have 4 children 2 were 3&4 at the time,the other 2 teenagers.She put on a brave face(which must have been so hard) and had a brilliant Christmas day,for the sake of the kids.
At the time all her christmas cards were up alongside condolence cards.
The twins deserve the best Christmas ever.
2007-11-25 02:04:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by x Queen Bee x 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
Can this poor couple do anything right for you people??
If they said they were going to have a fab christmas,they would be slagged off for that too.
2007-11-25 05:18:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pat R 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
The other children are so young I doubt it will much matter to them. The whole family has lost a young child and are coping as best they can, whatever people's opinions of what the parents did or didn't do. Who can say how any of us would behave in the face of such a tragedy? It's not for us to judge, Madeline could be suffering unimaginable abuse assuming she's still alive.
2007-11-25 01:57:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
4⤋
Erm - their Christmas is their business.
2 year olds don't bother with Christmas anyway - they don't know about it, so don't let it worry you.
2007-11-25 06:19:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by bec 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think kids are something the UK middle classes kind of outsource these days. They're more of a lifestyle option than anything else really for these kinds of people.
2007-11-25 01:57:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by ketkonen 7
·
5⤊
4⤋
PLEASE just leave them be. This is just newspaper hype anyway. No matter what they say or do they will never satisfy some people. It doesnt say they will deny the twins a christmas - just that they will be sad. I would think less of them if they said they would be partying from the rafters - wouldnt you XXXX
2007-11-25 01:50:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
6⤋
I agree they are simply unbelievable, they should be behind bars in prison.
Plus they are using the "fund" to pay their mortgage off......what's next to pay their legal fees?
2007-11-25 02:00:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
I doubt that what they have said implies that.
2007-11-25 01:49:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
you are being rediculous. where in that article does it say that.
2007-11-25 01:55:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by kati 6
·
6⤊
2⤋
Selfless parent's, thats why!
2007-11-25 01:51:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋