English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Bush wont attack Iran, he'll get the Army to do it.

2007-11-24 23:40:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

Bush will never get Congressional approval to attack Iran. He won't even get Congressional approval to use military action against Iran if necessary, which is what he pulled with Iraq turning into a war.

If he attacked Iran without the authorization of Congress he should be immediately removed from office and imprisoned for the rest of his life.

2007-11-25 03:53:36 · answer #2 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 0 0

He has a faithful, fanatical following, who do no longer view ragheads as human beings. see you later as Bush isn't waging conflict against human beings (exterior the midsection classification), he would be trumpeted because of the fact the dazzling conflict hero he longed to be returned while he exercised his go out "strategery" for Vietnam. Too few human beings comprehend in simple terms how disastrous this presidency has been. maximum historians comprehend that's the worst administration in US historic previous. yet historians focus on preserving modern with the information. If that is not any longer Britney Spears, or Runaway Bride, or the pets of Ellen Degeneres, that is not any longer relatively worth understanding approximately. what number civilians died in Iraq at present? Who cares? what number human beings even comprehend what number squaddies have died in Iraq so a techniques? Bah! This Thanksgiving we've plenty to be thankful for. we can thank Allah our u . s . isn't tousled like some center jap backwater. we can be grateful gasoline is in simple terms $3.25 a gallon. we can be grateful no distant places aggressor has invaded and occupied our u . s ., slain six hundred,000 of our voters, and displaced yet another 2 million from their residences. And we can be grateful that hedge fund managers proceed to circumvent taxes shouldered via something individuals, and that inventory portfolios have risen so extreme under the considerate deficit spending and unprovoked conflict of this president, and that undesirable frozen american embryos are recognized extra fairly than the lives of iraqi infants, Allahu Akbar!

2016-10-09 10:54:08 · answer #3 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

If America ever attacks Iran,it would be with the approval of Congress and not due to whims and fancies of Bush.No,the Hell wouldn't break loose but shall be contained and hammered inside of Iran.Hope Iran realizes the geopolitical ground conditions/realities and restrains itself

2007-11-25 02:05:11 · answer #4 · answered by brkshandilya 7 · 0 0

You mean if Bush gives the order to attack Iran? That will not happen becaus he has less than one year in office remaining and planning like that takes a long time--unless planning has already started. Anyways, we should not go to war against Iran, instead we should modernize our forces and prepare for a second cold war against China.

2007-11-24 23:51:54 · answer #5 · answered by General Vic 2 · 1 2

I heard that congress has a back up plan (both parties) that if he attempts such, they will vote no confidence and have him taken into custody.

But if Bush tries it, you may expect some holy hell to break lose here.

2007-11-25 00:00:13 · answer #6 · answered by Fancy That 6 · 3 0

stand and watch just like there doing now.
we've been brainwashed were too afraid to stand up like the day of old.
If we don't defend the constitution we don't deserve to have it.

We should not have to sacrifice personal liberty in exchange for security.

Iran will be attacked then Syria

2007-11-25 00:55:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Bush could only get away with it currently with one way. Air attack, probably go after their nuclear plant.

I don't think all hell will break lose. But I think people will question the "wag the dog" syndrome, like they did with Clinton.

Currently there is no way he could get support to invade. He'd be crucified for even suggesting it now.

Peace

Jim

.

2007-11-24 23:48:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I don't think the american public can be conned two times in a row.

2007-11-25 00:01:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I think the united states would be correct in effecting air strikes and a possible ground invasion of the enemy Iran

Iran is an oil rich rogue state that festers with and sponsors fundamentalism throughout the middle east.

People are killed and maimed on a daily basis in Iraq because of the worlds inability to act against the supply of weapons ,money and training to the iraq inurgents.

The united states has the resources to take swift and blinding action against those who would harm and oppress us.Evil thrives when good men do nothing.

Perhaps the administration will suffer a backlash from the trendy liberals who are fortunate enough not to exist in the oppressive and murderous islamic states.
What the liberals fail to recognise is that without preemptive action the effects of dwindling oil stocks and the destabilisation of the middle east due to the nuclear arming of Iran ,will ultimatley bring the chickens home to roost in their backyard.Only then will they wake up and smell the coffee......too late.

2007-11-25 00:02:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

I think Bush would be charged for warcrimes.
Anyways he already killed 1 million iraqis and 4000 americans so it aint a big deal for him

2007-11-24 23:59:48 · answer #11 · answered by BUSH/ISRAEL =warcriminal 5 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers