dont you think you ought to have at least a winning record?
2007-11-24 21:50:12 · 10 answers · asked by cheesehead with an attitude 5 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
you cant play more than 12 games
2007-11-24 22:12:16 · update #1
seems like a good recipe for a lot of sh*tty, superfluous corporate-branded bowl games, doesn't it
2007-11-24 22:17:08 · answer #1 · answered by Blake B 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't see anything wrong with it. I enjoy watching interregional matchups, even against mediocre teams. I also like the 6-6 SEC vs 10-2 MAC matchups, and things like that.
2007-11-25 10:18:39 · answer #2 · answered by blibityblabity 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree....a team should at least have to have a winning record. 7-5 would be better.
2007-11-25 10:24:52 · answer #3 · answered by ♠KPT STYLE♠ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you only have to win 6. you can be 6- 7
2007-11-25 06:04:35 · answer #4 · answered by crazzijimsmith 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It makes you eligible but with the parody in college ball this year, it more than likely wont be enough to go bowling unless it was the KMart bowl in Bangor, Maine.
2007-11-25 05:58:50 · answer #5 · answered by jesus_and_the_decibels 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's called way too many bowl games.
2007-11-25 08:51:54 · answer #6 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah
2007-11-25 05:57:08 · answer #7 · answered by SociallyAwkwardPenguin 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and that is why bowls only matters after christmas.
2007-11-25 06:19:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You become eligible for one of he pre-Christmas bowls, which is why NCAAF should go to a NFL type playoff system.
2007-11-25 06:40:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i've always thought so. there are just too many which is the problem.
2007-11-25 06:38:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋