2007-11-24 21:42:03 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I have a feeling the ones that are in the lead now will fade and it will be Romney and Oboma running with Romney winning.
Hillary is a train wreck! She has so many skeletons in her closet, she has no experience at anything, and has done absolutely nothing since shes been in office. Everybody always talks about how intelligent she is but when she testified in in front of the senate she "couldn't recall" ANYTHING! Funny how she got $8 million for her memoirs when she can't seem to ever remember anything important. It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that shes a woman, shes just a phony! She would do better if she picked ONE side to any topic and stuck to it!
2007-11-25 02:21:34 · answer #1 · answered by Kingler 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the more important question is who will the two parties select as their presidential nominees? We've got a year before the election and a few weeks to go before the first round of primaries. On the Democrat side, the choice has been pretty much given between Obama and Hillary. That's going to be a tough one for the Democrats to decide because neither one appeal across a broad enough spectrum to get elected. However, depending on who the Republicans nominate, the Democrat contender could actually have a chance of winning.
As for the Republicans, there are too many candidates that have already proven to be two-faced and part of the same good ol' boy network that is connected with the man in office. A man whose presidential ratings are some of the lowest in history. Americans are fed up with both sides because they are acting as one, citizens wishes be damned. The one candidate who I think will turn the tide and become elected if he is the Republican nominee is Ron Paul. He is the only candidate that takes every piece of legislation that comes before him and compares it to our constitution. If it passes constitutional guidelines, then he votes for it. If not, he votes against it. If every member of congress would do that, we would have one heck of a system and people would actually have to be responsible for themselves and their decisions. The rest of the Republican candidates have one or two issues that are very polarizing amongst their voting constituents and a person such as Giuliani, who hasn't met an anti-gun bill he didn't like, will not sway enough voters to vote for him.
Folks will be more motivated to vote according to their dislikes than whom they support. People who hate Hillary will come out and vote for the Republican candidate or not vote at all. People who are tired of the Republican party's performance will either vote Democrat or stay home. We don't have a high voter turnout in this country anyway and it's mainly because people are highly discouraged by the qualities(or lack of) that the candidates possess. You put a candidate like Ron Paul in as a party representative and you'll see a high turnout. If Ron Paul runs independently, you'll see a major turnout to vote for him against the other two. He is the first person in decades to actually have a chance to win on an independent ticket.
2007-11-25 12:11:29 · answer #2 · answered by John 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Whoever the controlling entity of America wants to win. By using a "no let up bombardment" & attacking those not in their favor on the communication networks of America(newspapers,radio, tv and/or internet). The process of elimination was underway at the very beginning of the race. Some of the primary candidates are basically ignored by the media.There are a select few that receive 95% of the exposure to the American people. The exposure is either positive or negative, depending on who corporate America wants to be in the white house. Clinton & Giuliani have been pushed by the media since the start of the campaign. With the constant exposure it is easily understandable that they are ahead at the poles. I believe with either of these people America will just get more of the same. In fact, I see no difference in the major candidates on either side. I hope I am wrong.
2007-11-25 06:34:51 · answer #3 · answered by peepers98 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hillary Clinton has the intelligence and experience as a lawyer, Senator and former First Lady in order to be a good President.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-11-25 06:31:12 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
maybe thompson, i just Obama don't win, i think he is a fool, check the artical on my 360 blog
2007-11-25 07:49:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton or Obama
2007-11-25 05:44:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Whoever wins it will be an improvement on GW Bush.
2007-11-25 06:45:07 · answer #7 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Either way, we all win when G.W. is moving his toys out on the front lawn.
2007-11-25 05:50:18 · answer #8 · answered by Yulik MahBaht 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋