Rudy?
Hillary?
or you won't vote?
2007-11-24 16:44:54 · 15 answers · asked by Jagger Otto 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Third party if those are my options
2007-11-24 16:47:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Ron Paul in a heartbeat. Hillary will be worse than Bush, abusing the Executive powers to the fullest. Rudy would be just as bad as Bush. The last person we need for president is someone who exploited the 9/11 attacks for political gain. What kind of a retard gives firefighters new defective radios eight years after the '93 world trade center attacks?? What kind of a person would lie to the families of victims on 9/11 saying all 121 firefighters disobeyed evacuation orders to get out saying they were heroes for wanting to stay in the building!???? the list goes on my friend
it just boggles my mind that people are lead to believe that HIllary is better than Bush because she wants nationalized health care and "better care for seniors." Hello, she is more than welcomed to invade Iran, has no plans for Iraq and wants to restrict the use of supplements. I don't want to have to get a prescription to take Cats claw, ester C or red yeast rice!!
2007-11-24 16:56:27 · answer #2 · answered by Matt P 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
When it comes down to it, you've got to look at character. What's more noble? To forgive infidelity, or to flaunt it on television? Hillary Clinton would get my vote, in that case.
Of course, I'd rather pick someone who had neither committed adultery nor had to forgive it. Mitt Romney is my first choice.
Oh, and you can't abstain in these situations. Sure, you can stand up and say, "Don't look at me, I didn't vote for him," but how much does that really accomplish? If you want to get something done, then you first have to do something.
2007-11-24 17:14:52 · answer #3 · answered by Paper Mage 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hillary.
2007-11-24 17:49:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
As of now i'm voting for Obama. If I had to choose between those two (Rudy) I'd take Hillary. I can not give my country, civil liberties, and brother's life to the repuplican party. They have had there chance to f up the world.
2007-11-24 16:53:26 · answer #5 · answered by Philip J 3 · 2⤊ 6⤋
I wouldn't abstain, but I certainly wouldn't vote for either of them. Both of them are part of the political machine. They both owe favors, and they both have been caught in lies. But then that is what politicians do best (look at Bush, Nixon, older Bush). I don't know which of what is left I would vote for now.
2007-11-24 16:54:29 · answer #6 · answered by Diane B 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Hillary Clinton has the intelligence and experience as a lawyer, Senator and former First Lady in order to be a good President.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-11-24 17:13:30 · answer #7 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 6⤋
Obama
2007-11-24 20:05:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Neither. Ron Paul all the way. The only candidate who wants to end this joke of a war. Our soldiers were lied to and deserve to be home with their families.
2007-11-24 16:51:39 · answer #9 · answered by averstar23 2 · 4⤊ 4⤋
i just would not vote if that's the only choice i had
2007-11-25 00:42:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Between the two... probably Hillary.
But who would their running mates be? That makes a big difference to me....
Look at all the stuff that is Cheney's fault...
2007-11-24 16:52:48 · answer #11 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋