Answer any canadate, but plze explain why.
I was on a Huckabee train till he has wrecked it with, soft illegal immigration stance...
Know considering Hunter, Would and Ciould Love Ron Paul if he had a back bone about the war issue.....
losing is NOT an optiop
2007-11-24 16:22:36 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Wow some excellent thoughts and points. Fake name tried too email u, I like that u have a pair.
I will look into rudy' record about the marriage situation, I have been under the impression he supported gay rights, but he really worry s me cuz of NY being a sanctuary city.
2007-11-26 12:55:56 · update #1
Ya I want to listen ti Dunken Hunter a bit more, and Romney.
2007-11-26 12:56:39 · update #2
Thanks again, to those who could answer a ?
If u cannot say what it is you like maybe you should look into what the candidate stands for
2007-11-27 13:57:51 · update #3
Find the man or woman who the corporations refuse to sponsor, and/or who the mainstream media refuse to give air time to, and you'll pretty much have a good idea who my candidate is.
I don't go for the choices that have already been made for me.
Edit: Oooo... I see several people have thumbed me down. Too bad the facts are what they are: The successful candidate WILL be one who received millions from corporations, and who got significant air time in the MSM.
2007-11-24 16:29:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Obama
2007-11-25 04:06:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Aunt Minta,
Ask yourself, what buisness is it of the federal government to reslove points 6, 7, and 8. Are these issues best left up the local small government big buracrats sitting in Washington?
2007-11-25 00:52:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Ron Paul.
NO OTHER CANDIDATE will end an illegal, unjust, unconstitutional war immediately. NONE. Ron is the only candidate with the balls to stand up for the young men and women dying each day for this farce of a war. They were lied to, and do not deserve another minute in the sand.
2007-11-25 00:48:05 · answer #4 · answered by averstar23 2 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Fred Thompson
2007-11-25 00:28:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Karen Kwiatkowski, Lt. Col. USAF, but since she has decided not to run, Christine Smith is almost as good a choice.
If Bob Barr would run, that would be a good choice as well.
2007-11-25 01:41:24 · answer #6 · answered by Gray Wanderer 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I am 100% behind Hillary Clinton. I agree with her views the most, and I think she has the needed experience to be a good president.
2007-11-25 01:29:36 · answer #7 · answered by jellybean24 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Guys, lets face it, a piece of cheese would be a more competant president than George W Bush.
The cheese may smell bad when left in the sun, but Bush's pollicies smell bad no matter what the weather is like.
The cheese is far more 'cultured' than Bush.
The cheese is appreciated by the French, a claim that Bush can never attain.
And finally, the cheese can be cut up and fed to the hungry.
Although... so can Bush...
2007-11-25 01:15:24 · answer #8 · answered by The Answer 1 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Any Republican would help me sleep better at night! Bye!
2007-11-26 00:59:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton has the intelligence and experience as a lawyer, Senator and former First Lady in order to be a good President.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-11-25 01:16:44 · answer #10 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋