English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
12

Who thinks Kansas is still the better team? After watching this game I still believe Kansas is better. They would have had a great chance to win if they didn't miss those two field goals and a interception at the two yard line.

2007-11-24 15:53:39 · 12 answers · asked by St. John Bosco 6 in Sports Football (American)

12 answers

yes they are still the better team but good teams have their bad days and this was a bad day for kansas. Still i think if Missouri loses to oklahoma in the big 12 championship, kansas has a shot at the national title, why not?

2007-11-24 16:01:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

It was a close game, but Mizzou won- end of story.

What I am more confused about is why now that Kansas has lost ONE game its like they don't even exist anymore? Ok, so you lose in the final week to a top5 team and you're dog liver, but if you lost to some unranked .500 type school two or three weeks ago you still rock!!!

Just shows what morons the 'haters' on here are.

2007-11-24 16:17:08 · answer #2 · answered by donfolstar 3 · 1 0

They didnt get screwed out of anything. For every one of the calls that werent made against KU, there were calls not made against SIU. The refs let SIU get away with a lot of bs fouls (they were calling them on KU), called Arthur for traveling, when he obviously didnt (which took away 2 points), let alone all the travel calls and 5 second calls they didnt call on SIU and 3 second lane violations. People ***** and moan about calling the game fair on both ends, if it had been done, KU would have won by a lot more than just 3 points. SIU is lucky the refs didnt foul every one of them out of the game.

2016-05-25 06:58:13 · answer #3 · answered by cathy 3 · 0 0

You keep thinking that. Mizzou rode KU's butt the whole game without flinching. KU looked like a bunch of JV high school kids playing with seniors. It was all they could do to fight for a few points so the game didn't look like a total wipe out.

2007-11-24 15:58:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Mizzou is the better team. You can always say if this or that happened my team would have won. That's why we play the game.

2007-11-24 16:08:49 · answer #5 · answered by RB 5 · 0 0

You can't look at the "if's". They had other chances. Just
admit, a better team won!

2007-11-24 16:06:03 · answer #6 · answered by Jbuckeye 5 · 0 0

Sorry, no. Their offense was shut down for 3 quarters by Missouri's D.

2007-11-24 15:58:49 · answer #7 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 2 1

KANSAS SUCKS!
THE ONLY REASON THEY HAD IT THIS FAR WITHOUT BEING DEFEATED WAS BECUASE THEY HAVNT PLAYED A DECENT TEAM. AND PROBABLY DIDNT HAVE DUMB REF'S WHO WENT CRAZY WITH THE FLAGS AGISNT THE BEST TEAM!

GO MU!
BEAT OU!
GO MU!
BEAT OU!
GO MU!
BEAT OU!
GO MU!
BEAT OU!

2007-11-24 16:26:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Get real. The only reason KU was ever in this game was because the refs went flag crazy against MU.

2007-11-24 15:57:55 · answer #9 · answered by vinny_says_relax 7 · 3 3

Puhleeeese.

The Jayhawks just figured out what happens when you play a better team.

2007-11-24 15:58:40 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers