Hi. I think a black hole is a physical effect of gravity shearing space/time. Anti-matter? That requires a change (reversal) in electrical properties and I see no reason for that to happen.
2007-11-24 14:57:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cirric 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The densest mass in the atom's elementary components is a Neutron. Therefore a neutron is a black hole.
According to Black hole definition the larger the mass of the black hole the lower its density.
The size of the black holes stems from a Schwartzchid solution of Einstein's Field equation of General relativity theory. At Schwartzchild radius light just orbits the mass of the black hole,hence its locked in from escaping. However Relativity theory never took into account temperature; Hence black holes would theoretically be subject to temperature; If a mass structure gets hot enough it would radiate. Hence from the defintion of mass structures a Black hole Mass would also radiates as a function of temperature but the radiation would not be outward bound ,only inward bound.
These solutions and assumptions are hypothetical concerning Back hole behavior.
In the micro world the neutron fits the description of Black holes.
And in the macroworld The Universe fits the description of a Black hole,where light is locked in and cannot escape the Universe.
What is called antimatter is really the Substance of space ,in a compressed state,which at one time was called the Aether.
Time is a quantity that indicates the level of space substance's pressure. The smaller a mass is the less time is involved to hold the mass into a structure. The scenaro is the inverse for very large mass.
Hence what is presently called dark matter is really the substance of antimatter. The volume of the antimatter exceeds the volume of mass by many folds.
As per astronomical observation there is more space than mass in the Universe.
See Abhas Mitra's papers for the New description of what is a Black holes supposed to be.
2007-11-24 15:11:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by goring 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
A black hole is a region of space in which the gravitational field is so powerful that nothing can escape after having fallen past the event horizon. The name comes from the fact that even electromagnetic radiation (e.g. light) is unable to escape, rendering the interior invisible. However, black holes can be detected if they interact with matter outside the event horizon, for example by drawing in gas from an orbiting star. The gas spirals inward, heating up to very high temperatures and emitting large amounts of radiation in the process.
While the idea of an object with gravity strong enough to prevent light from escaping was proposed in the 18th century, black holes as presently understood are described by Einstein's theory of general relativity, developed in 1916. This theory predicts that when a large enough amount of mass is present within a sufficiently small region of space, all paths through space are warped inwards towards the center of the volume, forcing all matter and radiation to fall inward.
While general relativity describes a black hole as a region of empty space with a pointlike singularity at the center and an event horizon at the outer edge, the description changes when the effects of quantum mechanics are taken into account. Research on this subject indicates that, rather than holding captured matter forever, black holes may slowly leak a form of thermal energy called Hawking radiation.
2007-11-25 00:30:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by jareck 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
well a black hole is made of all normal matter.
and in particle accelerators the particles are accelerated to near the speed of light, and after billions of particles are fired maybe one or 2 become anti-matter. in a black hole once an atom reaches the singularity thats it. the massive gravity would keep everything in one spot. and their would no longer be atoms, there would be quark-gluon plasma. so basically all you would get is an anti-quark on occasion, which would release a small amount of energy in the form of a gamma ray, which would then turn back into another particle.
and the black hole couldnt produce anti-matter in large amounts because once it was created it would be immediately destroyed because there would be so much other normal matter around it.
and your thinking of anti-matter as an abstract idea, something strange, foreign. anti-matter is simply matter with the same mass as normal matter, but with the opposite charge. theres nothing "otherworldly" about it at all. large amounts of it wouldnt create a bridge between another universe. theres no logical or scientific reason why it would.
2007-11-24 16:07:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A black hole is a dead star that is very tighly packed to gain strong gravity. It looks like a hole but it's not. It just don't reflect light like an ordinary object. Wken light shines in an ordinary object, it reflects it back that's why we can see it. But in black holes, it absorbs light and never reflect it back so we cannot see it. A hole is formed when light from other stars are bent by the gravity. A black hole is not a portal system. A portal system is what we call wormhole that link a dimension of the universe to another.
2007-11-25 00:13:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Black Holes do no longer exist. No Probe or spacecraft has ever been close to a minimum of one and no person on planet Earth has ever seen one up close. that's the main ridiculous concept oftentimes happening and dumb sheeple certainly have faith what they have been informed via scientists and astronomers that Black Holes exists while in actuality they in no way seen each guy or woman they're doing is verifying their very own version of effects and information and shoving it in our faces and making desire us to have faith in this delusion stated as black holes.
2016-10-18 00:56:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by olmeda 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Peering into the heart of a Black Hole;
Quantum mechanics might be capable of stripping bare a black hole to reveal the mysterious and unseeable 'singularity' that exists at its heart, say George Matsas and André da Silva of the São Paulo State University in Brazil. It has long been suspected that these singularities "where the known laws of physics break down" are always decorously veiled behind the 'event horizon', a boundary beyond which light cannot escape from the fearsome gravitational pull of a black hole. Theoretically, nothing within an event horizon can ever be perceived or investigated by an outside observer, because no light can escape. So the singularities remain insulated from the rest of the Universe. This amounts to what in 1969 physicist Roger Penrose called 'cosmic censorship', whereby the laws of physics conspire to save us from having to gaze on the unthinkable. According to Einstein's general theory of relativity, in the middle of a black hole, its mass collapses in on itself to form an infinitely small, infinitely dense point, where space-time itself is punctured. Even causality " the relation of a cause and its effect " breaks down, which seems to defy not only physics but logic. "Penrose's motivation seemed to be to preserve the decorum of physics," Matsas says. But physicists have wondered whether event horizons are ever stripped away, leaving these absurdist singularities naked. One possibility, for example, is that the event horizon might vanish if a black hole spins very fast. Light and matter might then be flung out by centrifugal force.
"It is widely believed that quantum gravity will unveil the structure of the singularities."In September, physicists Arlie Petters of Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, and Marcus Werner of the University of Cambridge, UK, proposed that singularities stripped naked by fast rotation should be detectable by astronomers because they act as very strong 'gravitational lenses', bending the light coming from stars behind them by their distortion of space-time.
2007-11-24 22:19:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by SPACEGUY 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Okay, so this is just a matter of opinion. Now all the loonies can come here and spout crap about wormholes, white holes, and time travel.
(Just remember that there exist no facts about the inside of a black hole beyond that there is a singularity in there generating the black hole. Everything else is just a guess.)
2007-11-24 17:54:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ultraviolet Oasis 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
A black hole is a collapsed star whose gravitational field is so powerful as to prevent the escape of mass or light.
It cannot be directly observed --------- but it's influence on nearby stars can be measured AND USED to calculate the position of the singularity.
This web site answers many of the common questions about black holes.
http://cosmology.berkeley.edu/Education/BHfaq.html
2007-11-24 15:47:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bullseye 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You should be able to google Michio Kaku or String Theory cause that what it sounds like (your question). Dr Kaku says that we live in a multiverse like soap bubbles, different sizes, different make up and that black holes are the connectors. You should read some of his theories - very interesting and plausible. Finally we are beginning to grow beyond the einsteinian limitations.
2007-11-24 15:05:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by metalsoft@sbcglobal.net 2
·
0⤊
0⤋