wtf....thats greatness
2007-11-24 23:30:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
In my job I come across a lot of strange stories, but this is one is almost too wild to believe. In December 2004, The Sunshine Project, a watchdog group based in Austin, Tex., and Hamburg, Germany, that opposes biological weapons, uncovered a "U.S. military proposal to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting." The story got some press in early 2005, but quickly vanished into that great internet junkyard of forgotten URLs, the only memory being a lonely wikipedia entry.
There it lay, all but dead until one week ago when The Huffington Post resuscitated the tale with a tongue-in-cheek entry asking: "[i]sn't it always the best ideas which fall by the wayside?" A CBS news affiliate in California adopted it last Friday and since then this offbeat classic has experienced a viral rebirth across the blogosphere. Here are the broad-strokes:
The proposal came from the Air Force's Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, which requested $7.5 million to develop a so-called "gay-bomb." Using the Freedom of Information Act, Edward Hammond, director of the U.S. office of the Sunshine Project, obtained a copy which was "part of a military effort to develop non-lethal weapons." If completed, the bomb would release a chemical aphrodisiac "and by virtue of either breathing or having their skin exposed to this chemical... soldiers would become gay." This would cause their units to break down as the troops "became irresistibly attractive to one another." In addition to a "gay bomb" the proposal also mentions using chemicals which could make bees angry so that enemy forces would be attacked not only by our troops but also swarms of stinging insects.
Defense Department officials have acknowledged that such ideas were proposed by the Air Force in 1994, and then "quickly dismissed." They played down the significance of the Sunshine report, stating that many proposals come their way that are rejected for ethical reasons. But Hammond disputes their dismissal as "absolutely incorrect." He contends, that "if [the ideas] had been summarily rejected I would never have found them." He went on to state that the Joint Non-lethal Weapons Directorate, based out of Quantico, actually used the "gay-bomb" idea as a marketing tool in a CD-ROM from 2001-2002 and that "the Pentagon... submitted it to the highest scientific review body in the country."
2007-11-24 13:19:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Your emotions will basically be harm as lengthy as you enable them to be harm. Atheists often are wounded animals. Animal potential somebody who basically reacts to somebody who has harm them. human beings take each and each difficulty because it comes and determines how they'll respond. There are atheists interior the international who've concept out no remember if or no longer they suspect in a a techniques better power and concluded that they don.t. that's is particularly considerable which you do no longer categorize one complete team of people. Categorization is the 1st step in the direction of bigotry. the certainty which you're asking exhibits you're too sturdy to be lumped in with the different bigots. that's the certainty. think of a circle, the interior that's painted white and the exterior is painted black and is going on for eternity. the line that delineates white and black is the obstacle of guy's information. the exterior is what guy does not comprehend. the certainty that we don't comprehend what's exterior the circle has ABSOLUTE 0 meaning that the section exterior the circle does not exist. I desire you nicely on your seek for the certainty. remember. in simple terms because you won't be able to articulate some thing into phrases doesnt' recommend some thing isn't actual. although, in case you are able to articulate it, share it including your brethren here in the international. What you are able to articulate is your present.
2016-10-09 10:26:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats funny lol, and don't believe a word, but if it was true, it would be even funnier if the wind suddenly changed direction, after they had sprayed and it headed for the American lines
2007-11-24 21:07:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are people in this world who will believe anything. Why do you think magazines such as National Enquirer, Sun, Globe and all those yellow journalism sells so much.
2007-11-24 13:09:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by worldneverchanges 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
There's an online crap-shack called worldnetdaily.com that, in an article, claims soy milk makes you gay. So according to that "logic", it may be simpler to give the Iraquis soy milk. What is this world coming to?
2007-11-24 13:24:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I wonder if that was in the perfume an aunt sent me for Christmas in the long ago.
Rose P.
PS Hi SweetElf
RP.
2007-11-24 13:16:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by rose p 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Lol no I would never believe that because it's obvious that it's a load of BS.
That's one crazy Urban Legend.
2007-11-24 13:27:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by ♆Şрhĩņxy - Lost In Time. 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
The answer to over-pop!
Two, four six, eight,
We don't overpopulate!
Who cares what UR as long as you're having fun at it
2007-11-24 13:07:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Just Tink 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
HAHAHAHAHA! (thanks for the laugh, boy I needed it) A *gay spray* hahahaha! And *I* thought my mom was nuts because she still believes O.J. is innocent. I cannot believe your wifes mom would be so gullible.
2007-11-24 13:19:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by PURR GIRL TORI 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Im a florida boy and I knew something was wrong with key west!!!!!!! Bless momma heart
2007-11-24 13:57:29
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋