English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i previously asked if george bush had done more damage than everyone in history combined. people said hitler, stalin, mao, pinochet, etc....i did not mean did mr. bush kill more people. i meant has he done more damage? when you pollute the world with depleted uranium and burn massive amounts of energy, it leads to the long term destruction of everything and everyone. the victim of war is not just people. it's the environment. Perpetual PEACE please. not perpetual war.

i am asking has george bush done more harm to the world than everyone else combined so far? is he a usurper? was he non-fraudulently elected?

2007-11-24 11:25:34 · 18 answers · asked by thomasdavidhalbrook@yahoo.com 2 in Politics & Government Elections

18 answers

umm....no....I do believe that China has a much worse record environmentally.

2007-11-24 11:31:19 · answer #1 · answered by TLB 5 · 4 0

Look at China ,the former USSR and its offspring. The United States is the most regulated country on the planet! Study who funds these environmental causes you will definitely be surprised. Shill Clinton laid waste to the Balkans with depleted uranium. They can't even grow food. Like the Romans salting the earth of their enemies to cut off their food supplies.
How about India, Pakistan, and France with above ground nuclear testing. I'm pretty sure they know the stuff blows up. I am not a Supporter of King GW. I don't care for liberals or fake conservatives because you have been lied to by both of them. Buddy you need to wake up and do some research on this is a world wide police the population and sovereignty control issue rather than a planet damage issue. The UN wants a global tax money transfer scheme on carbon. Like a fractional reserve bank loan with interest for carbon.

2007-11-24 12:18:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

A usurper? Of what? Proper pronunciation?

No he was not fraudulently elected and NO, I don't much think ANY person can do the job of president anymore.

Look at Plyler v. Doe. The Supreme Court DID usurp representative governance by setting legal precedent against the stated intent of an amendment that had been written, debated, re-written and finally ratified by a congress the PEOPLE ELECTED.

We're past being represented. We've no option but to represent ourselves.

Demand the power to veto ANY item of ANY bill passed by the Hill before being sent to the Oval Office.

We'll chaperon their hall passes if need be!

...

2007-11-24 12:58:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yes, I caught him with a butane torch melting the polar ice caps, right after he got done clear-cutting a 700 acre rain forest, listening in on everyone's phone calls, organizing 9/11, reading everyone's emails, and opening everyone's snail mail.

He also let me in on his past nefarious plots. He's actually the one who caused the fall of the Roman Empire, the Black Plague, the Crusades, the Inquisition, manifest destiny, the Civil War, he assassinated President Lincoln, placed the iceberg in the path of the Titanic, sunk the Lusitania, started WWI, and bombed Pearl Harbor.

He's been a busy guy the last fifteen hundred years.

I took the butane torch from him, but he still had a baseball bat, so he went clubbing baby seals. I decided not to mess with him.

2007-11-24 11:56:09 · answer #4 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1 0

You're asking several questions. I'll focus on your initial query: has he destroyed the environment of the world more than any person in history?

Answer: no. George Bush only represents the better interests of American and trans-national corporations -- those that have existed for decades -- that prefer the bottom line (profits) over the reduction of pollutants. He is at worst a facilitator, helping to maintain the status-quo for a country (among many) that churns out pollution as a byproduct of a wasteful culture.

2007-11-24 11:35:36 · answer #5 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 1 1

interestingly that there are a number of idiots responding to this question. George Bush won't smash the international. In 50 years, while the historical past of this era is written, he would be hailed using fact the guy who initiated lasting peace interior the middle East.

2016-10-18 00:24:39 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

again I am not bashing president Bush or any other president.. we the citizens are the problem.. we voted these presidents in and we are the ones doing the damage to this world.. during this presidency isnt the newer cars coming out that dont use as much gas and arent the solar power and wind power being used more than not.. when you start hitting on one president stop and look at the others in the past like vietnam war and civil war and all the other wars that have killed alot of our people and wasted alot of our resources lets not forget watergate. we the citizens do need more peace and kindness but we do need to take care of our homeland.. the peace and kindness does lean towards taking care of our brother countries and helping them out when needed..

2007-11-24 12:08:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'm not a supporter of the Bush administration, personally, but as former resident of the USSR, I have to say no, Bush has not done nearly as much environmental damage as all the leaders of the USSR - Chernobyl alone caused thousands of deaths, and you are still seeing its effects in children born today. Additionally, you still can't travel within a 50 mile radius of that town, and for good reason. I wasn't alive before that, so I can't name any other specific events, but I can only say that, currently, Eastern Europe, Africa, and China are the top contributors to environmental damage. That is one stupid thing Bush (and probably the only stupid thing left) has yet to contribute greatly to.

2007-11-24 11:31:58 · answer #8 · answered by Euralalya 5 · 4 0

No George Bush is one person he has done no more to destroy the environment than you or I. Now he was president at the time when 89% of Americans with short memory's were screaming for retaliation for 9/11, lest we forget, (never mind we already have).
No one in the mordern age has done as much damage to the environment as Chernobyl, or Mt St Helen's, but the worst is by far third world countries. Mexico with their sugar cane fires every summer that pollute air over 1/4 of south central US every year.
Country's like Iraq that set fire to entire oil feilds to cause civil distruption. Countries all over the world that have no EPA regulations, air quality alerts, or water restrictions. Countries that put lead into toys (recent headlines), sewage into creeks and rivers, still burn regular gasoline, and burn coal and crude oil in every building in their country have done far more than 1 single president popular or not........ Oh, by the way whoever you vote for is not going to help. Outside of telling you what you want to hear. None of them give a damn.... about your environment.
To answer your question, the person who has done the most damage to the world? Is the person who figured out how to distort,misconstrue, and practice law, then figured out how to get the average American to beleive his side of the story . By doing so they condemned the rest of us and our country to a certain and and destined self- destruction.

2007-11-24 11:58:56 · answer #9 · answered by peepaul 1 · 3 0

no just him alone ..there is alos them greedy things that are head of the masive oil and coal .also factory corparations.. they know better but they dont care.. as long as they can get ritch and sit on the fat **** holes it will always happen.. also there is countrys like china that keep over populating.. and the USA.. a part of the problem is the last genaration.. alll they did was ravish earth.. now we got a new genaration that mass produce. and refine ways to make more oil and gas production...and on yahoo is a good example of destruction.. all i see is young girls asking questions about they want to get pragnent.. think OVER POPULATION

2007-11-24 11:33:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You have overdosed on the environmentalist wacko left Kool-Aid.
Your doomsday cult will look REAL silly about 50 years from now, when the earth and people are doing even better than us.

2007-11-24 12:19:35 · answer #11 · answered by freedom_vs_slavery 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers