It's hard to tell, as it's so highly edited. She looks pretty from the photo, but editing can be misleading.
2007-11-24 10:01:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Average
2007-11-24 18:06:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
after studying it for a minute and canceling out the funny photo shot id say that if you sat her down and had a normal picture youd find her pretty breath taking and if youre asking this cuz shes your girl rave on and be in love but if youre just going to get in her pants-move on
2007-11-24 18:04:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by phtgrphr_poet_grl 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Beautiful, but I think it won't take much effort to be breath-takingly gorgeous with some eye make-up.
2007-11-24 18:13:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definately not a good picture for seeing beauty.
2007-11-24 18:06:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by FL Sunshine 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
niether ... its pretty average if your talking about beauty you could say heidi klum shes had kids and is still breathtaking beautiful
2007-11-24 18:16:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by cali-jazz 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
the picture is way too edited to even tell.
2007-11-24 18:00:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by coachlover92 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
beautiful
2007-11-24 17:59:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by just.vic.it 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
sorry shes not breath taking lol
2007-11-24 18:16:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Talk Talk 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
neither. but thats my opinion. probably she is just not my type, but I cant find anything atractive in her.
2007-11-24 18:00:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by pucatan 2
·
2⤊
0⤋