wow, that's a tough one. I think they are both pretty extreme, but i am going to have to go with Ann Coulter.
Though i will say, that though she IS extreme, sometimes i think she just says obnoxious things just to piss people off and get an argument started. LOL. Rosie sometimes does that as well though. But i think, with BOTH of them, sometimes people don't give them a chance to explain WHY they hold a particular view like they do. But immediately judge them as soon as they utter half a sentence. How can you judge someone based on ONE comment that isn't even half finished? In any case, though they're extreme at least they don't change their views on an issue just because people disagree i will give each credit for that.
But between the two....... yes, i'd definitely have to say that Ann Coulter is the more extreme. LOL ♥
*edit* Dconstructs answer was HILARIOUS! i'm LmAo!!! haHaha ChristopherK's was pretty funny as well! --> good deal, that was funny!
2007-11-24 09:14:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Both, they make their money by being extreme. Even when they have good logical arguments, they use the most inflammatory language possible.
Look at Ann Coulter, no one who graduated from Yale law school is incapable of making calm rational arguments. But would she sell as many books if she did?
Rosie O'Donnell is an entertainer, so she has every right to stupid, ignorant opinions. (see George Clooney for examples). But she also isn't stupid, so she could no doubt rationally argue her views. But if she did, who would watch?
Let's face it folks, this isn't political debate, this is entertainment. If you want well reasoned arguments pays attention to all those people whose names you don't know because they put their readers/viewers to sleep.
2007-11-24 09:20:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mark S 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
99.99% of people don't get Ann Coulter at all. There are tow tings that are highly over looked when reading / listening to her opinions.
1) Most of what she says is sardonic. You cannot take what she means word for word because she puts shock value into her messages.
2) She is not a politician, but makes her career as a political commentator. I.e. her money comes from how much attention she gets. Her priority is getting her stuff read and being tuned into when on t.v. More people pay attention to her stuff in order to just see what she's going to say next. If instead of "We should kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity" she had written "We should increase cultural exchange and diplomatic relations while seeking multi-lateral regional support for military operations," when writing about the mid-east, she doesn't get nearly as much attention, and therefore money.
Rosie is a fat Dee-iiike who should never open her mouth about politics and isn't even a funny comedian.
You don't have to agree with Ann, but most of the time Ann probably doesn't either, she's playing a sardonic role. It's just her job. Rosie is just an idiot.
Rosie by far.
2007-11-24 09:17:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Some dude 4
·
4⤊
4⤋
Rosie O. Coulter is a well respected author, her books are great, you should try reading one. What has Rosie O. done?
2007-11-24 09:41:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ann Coulter hands down!
Rosie picks on celebrities and Ann Coulter picks on everyone.
2007-11-24 09:07:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
Ann is because of her diabolical mind. However Rosie is loud, stupid and makes everyone laugh. Kind of a tie huh?
FYI, Ann isn't the spokes person for conservatives.
Thanks!
2007-11-24 09:29:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by The prophet of DOOM 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Coulter hands down.
Ann Coulter would start World War 3 if she could and would probably try to kill as many people who aren't right wing, heteorsexual Christians as she could.
"We just want Jews to be perfected, as they say." --Coulter arguing that it would be better if we were all Christian
just look up her quotes, she's a vile human being.
i'm not a huge fan of Rosie O'Donnell, but I know one thing, she probably would never advocate for the killing of anyone as Coulter has done.
2007-11-24 09:15:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ellie210 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Tough call. They are both scarily extreme in their views. I'd give a slight edge to Anne because I tend to have liberal beliefs so she seems more extreme to me.
I wonder, though, if Rosie and Anne ever touched each other, would they obliterate each other like matter and anti-matter?
2007-11-24 09:16:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Coulter. She is full of hate and uses it to sell books (frightening to consider - who is buying them - do they agree with such barbarism?) Hope she never gets in a position of power, for she would be a female Hitler.
2007-11-24 09:20:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by gortamor 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ann Coulter without doubt. I would really like to snap her freaky head clean off her shoulders with my bare hands. I would find it to be quite pleasurable. The woman knows very close to nothing. Wait, people find me to be very extreme in my views. Aren't human's a f*cked up breed?
2007-11-24 09:14:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Open your eyes 3
·
6⤊
2⤋