They think it will scare dummies into voting Republican.
Another ridiculous example . . . while riding in the car with us recently, my 85-year-old mother-in-law, knowing we are Democrats, suddenly blurted out, "You're not voting for Hillary, are you?"
I said she wasn't my first choice, but I would vote for her if she is the Dem nominee, she responded by asking if we were aware that when Bill was President, Hillary decorated the White House Christmas tree with condoms?
"And did you know," she continued, "that if Hillary becomes President she'll put our Armed Forces under the United Nations and make them wear United Nations uniforms and that there won't be any more American Army or Navy?"
Etc.
Where did she "learn" these things?
"I read it in a Christian magazine . . . and I heard it on the radio, too!"
Don't laugh, last election it succeeded 25 million times.
2007-11-25 01:35:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by worldinspector 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
All it is is party loyalty gone mad in an election year. It would be great if elections were based on issues instead of party loyalty.
By the way, it's like the pot calling the kettle black when a neo-con Repub. speaks. You must remember, the current "Republican Party" is not a TRUE Republican Party any longer; they are "neo-cons and VERY dangerous! Even many Republicans are disgusted by the change sooooo
far to the right.
For THE CROW:
Choosing to vote for a "party" and not the best candidate is NOT the way to begin your voting career! Already you have a team mindset that probably came from some programming in your life by an adult or peer group--FORGET IT!
All I'm saying is use your own mind, do your own research, and choose the candidate that touches you the most--Repub., Dem., Green, Socialist, WHATEVER. I wish you good luck.
2007-11-24 09:42:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
First and foremost: Some clarification. I'm a conservative as far as voting goes. I'm not yet 18, but when I do turn 18, I will vote for the best Republican candidate or I won't vote.
Second: I don't think that many republicans would say that that's true. If any republican were to say that the democrats actually support the terrorists monetarily, I'd say they were either reeeaaalllly anti-democrat, or just plain stupid. And I think that Georgy boy is more anti-democrat than stupid. He's not a stupid person, just definitely NOT a good orator.
And third:Those few Republicans that would say that, probably say it thinking (rather hopelessly) that it will damage the Democrats.
2007-11-24 09:21:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Crow 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
The Republicans are certainly the american Christian occasion. listed right here are some motives..that's the Democrats that desire to eliminate God from faculties, from homes from our funds and paper funds mutually as working via their liberal corporation stated as the ACLU. The Democrats are additionally in desire of partial start abortion which potential a woman could have her little one killed even after six months of being pregnant. The Republicans are against it. The Republicans desire to grant college vouchers to those that desire to deliver their teenagers to non-public Christian faculties and the Democrats are against it. The Republicans are the Christian occasion and human beings realize it.
2016-10-18 00:05:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by ludlum 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It may just be in response to those who dare to mention that GHW Bush was in business with the Bin Laden family in the Carlyle Group in Saudi Arabia for a number of years. A Bin Laden family member helped bail out Arbusto, an oil company previously headed by GW Bush in Texas. They are family friends and investors but supposedly the business ties were cut after 911. Other Bin Laden family members were in the U.S. on 911 and were whisked back to Saudi Arabia in one of the first planes allowed back in the air.
Somehow they have tied the Iraq war with terrorism even though there weren't any there until we showed up. This has caused many new radical sympathizers but somehow they don't relate that with our error in attacking Iraq. They are just grasping at straws to show their support for a mistake and have twisted the democrats view of terrorism because they are in favor of being on the offensive no matter how many new terrorists it creates. They fail to acknowledge that nobody was against the war in Afghanistan which was based on killing the terrorists who attacked us.
2007-11-24 09:41:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Directly, one thing and one thing only and that is to keep Republicans in the White House so they and their elite friends can continue to get richer. They care much more about the style and manner in which they (the Republicans) survive than a healthy an well rounded survival of America.
2007-11-24 09:49:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
democrat agenda is to win at any cost in 08,including hurting America ! the islamo facists agree and endorse the democrat candidates.check out al jazeera tv.they know the Republicans will continue to kick serious as*s till they are defeated.wake up kiddies, this is www4 and it will last at least 40/50 yrs if not longer.Now, should hillary or obama win then all bets are off.you may want to consider learning farsi and maybe investing in a couple prayer rugs.the dems have no balls to fight a war............
2007-11-24 11:11:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
They want weak minded followers to feel ashamed and treasonous for listening to what others have to say.
They want to create a connection between all groups that disagree with them, so as to make it seem to them that we are all just "evil"......... crafty rationalization skills at work.
I think Ron Paul can fix most problems we're facing in this polarizing political environment, he is the best of both worlds, pro-life/anti-war, he's the only one who brings people together.
2007-11-24 09:58:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jennifer 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
They are following the model set by Mussolini and Hitler by demonizing a portion of the citizenry in an effort to seize totalitarian control. They believe the ends justify any means and that their stewardship would be for the greater good of the country.
2007-11-24 09:10:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
Truth needs no OTHER motive.
Dems want the US to lose in Iraq. Terrorists want the US to lose in Iraq.
2007-11-24 10:32:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anthony M 6
·
3⤊
3⤋