Which are the pros and cons of these wrestlers??

Question

you have to name at least one for each wrestler...

1)Kane

2)Shawn Michaels

3)Goldberg

4)Ric Flair

5)Ole Anderson

some are controversial and some others not...
thanks...

Answer 1

ok koum, as i promised this answer will be the "Novel of Novels"
Unless.....LK answers it(d)..LOL JK!..LK you may answer it =D!

anyways, back to the Q

1. Kane - Pros = Well, he is focused on what he is doing! He dedicates himself to the business and he has a very good attitude towards it. He doesn't go on that many steroids and sets a good example towards the youngsters and the business! He is big, scary, confident, and pretty athletic for his weght too!

Cons = Well, even though it is not his fault, the WWE is not using him properly...he is more of a jobber in the mid-card "field." I think the WWE should make him have better fueds. He should aso be more of a main-eventer than a jobber. Also, he should have never left the old "Masked Kane" Gimmick. That gimmick suits him more than his "Unmasked Kane" Gimmick! He is not scary anymore....

2. Shawn Michaels- Pros = WOW...He has also one of the few people left from the "WWF Era" along with HHH and Undertaker. HBK can put up a great fight and he is a good entertainer. He is a combination of everything! He sometimes likes to fly around the ring with the moonsault, elbow drop and other high-flying moves! He is also a great technical wrestler!
He uses the sharpshooter, sleeper hold, and these are some of the many examples HBK uses during his match! I think the gimmick "Heart Break Kid" suits him very very well! He is very flexible and is a very good athlete for a 42 year old (D).


Cons = Well, he is kind of old...no offense. He wants everything his way. I really think HBK gets a lot of attention from us fans but he shouldn't get it. He really needs to turn heel...perhaps by attacking HHH! That would be a good storyline...afterall, we want to see HBK VS HHH! and NOT HHH AND HBK!LOL! I really don't have anything to say about HBK. Please do not kill me HBK fans(swt)!...

3. Goldberg- Pros = Whoa! He was an A.W.E.S.O.M.E athlete! He has just has the best DAMN spear in the history of spears! Goldberg really impresses me- He was a NFL player and he even played football in college! He is very strong for a 40 year old...LOL!

Cons = Well, deep down, I really think Goldberg was in the WWE just for his paycheck. In other words, I don't think he cared about us fans! He is more into acting than he is in wrestling and sports, now days! AND NO, ACTING IS NOT A SPORT! I wish goldberg never left the WWE..

4. Ric Flair - Pros = WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He is ridin, stylin, profilin, limousine riding! WOW..all i can say about him is...he worked on the mic properly. He had okay mic skills and he was the best dirtiest player in the Game i have seen! He has pretty good submission moves!WOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!LOL!

Cons = Well, just like goldberg, i think that he really does not care about us fans! He is not strong, and not very athletic. He has had problems with the WWE in the past and he is finally returning this monday! He would like everything his way..and not according to the WWE's way!..hmm! I also think he should turn heel because "FACE" doesn't suit him...

5. Ole Anderson- Pros = Well, in his prime, he was strong, athletic and one of the members of the legendary FOUR HORSEMEN!!!!!!!! He had pretty good wrestling skills! He was also in the faction Minnesota Wrecking Crew! Well, i really don't know that much about this guys...because i have not seen a lot of him!

Cons = Why did he retire two times?lol! Well, when he was in WCW...why did he kick sting out(un)! well, i kinda think he was not used properly in WCW when eric took over!..
Sorry, Koum, i really don't know much about him!..I'm Sorry :(

Well, sorry about my answer bout the Ole Anderson one...
i had no clue what to write...so anyways....Another Awesome Q by KOUMO!!!(un)..well, oops my bad..i mean Koum!
(B)! Koum = The New NBF Hardcore Champion(h)!!

LOL!

Answer 2

Kane- Pro- Really agile and talented big man Con- not being used right

Shawn Michaels- Pro- Good wrestler Con- Is better as a heel

Goldberg- Pro- None Con- Injured Bret Hart and put him out of wrestling the guy botches more than Botch Lesnar

Ric Flair- Pro- 16 time world champ/Legend Con- should retire (at least as a wrestler, could take a road agent, managers, or announcers role) Could also open a wrestling school

Ole Anderon-Pro- Member of the original Four Horsemen Group (Ole and Arn Anderson, Ric Flair, and Tully Blanchard, as well as manager J.J. Dillon) Con- Long Retired and it would be foolish for him to come back after his retirement in the early 1990s

Answer 3

Kane
Pros: A great attitude towards the business and the young guys.
Cons: Was only a marginally good big man.

Shawn Michaels
Pros: Amazing in-ring skills and mic work through the years.
Cons: Had an abysmal attitude during the early days.

Goldberg
Pros: Good look and the best spears I've ever seen.
Cons: Stiff and uncaring, just a plain poor wrestler who lost steam after the streak was broken.

Ric Flair
Pros: A top-notch in-ring presence and mic worker.
Cons: Bit too many comedy spots for my tastes and needs to hang up the boots eventually.

Old Anderson
Pros: Member of the legendary Four Horsemen.
Cons: Had some horrendous creative ideas in WCW.

Answer 4

1) Kane - Pro is that he is big, con is that he doesn't really have any wrestling moves.
2) Shawn Michaels - Pro is that he is entertaining and the fans like him, con is his constant bad back.
3) Goldberg - He is the greatest. I cannot say anything bad about him.
4) Ric Flair - Pros are that he is a great long time champion, his style, the fancy robes, etc. Cons are that he is too fake (Flair flop) and too old.
5) Ole Anderson - I haven't seen a lot of him.

Answer 5

Kane -- one of the greatest "monsters" ever, has the best chokeslam in the business. But he's not the monster he once was. He doesn't strike terror in his opponents anymore; they know they're going to get beat up, but not "killed". He's not the Kane that "electrocuted" Shane-O Mac's nuts, anymore.

Michaels -- the best in-ring performer in the WWE, always gives a great performance. Con - he's always teasing a heel-turn. Either do it, or stop teasing it.

Goldberg -- billed and marketed as unbeatable and indestructible and he was good at it. Con - billed and marketed as unbeatable and indestructible; that made him strictly one-dimensional.

Ric Flair -- the consummate professional. Gave some of the best promos of all-time. Con - uh...getting a bit old to be wrestling "kids" (couldn't really think of anything else).

Ole -- part of two of the greatest teams of all time: The Minnesota Wrecking Crew and The Four Horsemen. A rough and tough brawler who could wrestle as well. Con - he was his character outside of the job (he was mean and cold).

Answer 6

Kane- Pro- He is not greedy Con- He has turned into a jobber

Shawn Michaels- Pro- Good wrestler Con- Needs to be heel and the scewjob

Goldberg- Pro- None Con- This dumbass botches so much!

Ric Flair- Pro- 16 time world champ Con- His matches now are boring

Answer 7

Kane
pros: Big, strong, confident, tough, great finisher and puts up a great fight

cons: not that smart in the ring, could egt outnumbered by wrestlers, could illusionate at times

Shawn Michaels:
pros: Great fighter, smart, tough, self confident, great finsiher, great reflects, flexible, athletic

cons: Selfish, not likeable, talks to much

Goldberg:
pros: Strong, tough, athletic, true wrestler, self confident, likeable, doesn't take crap, goes against odds

cons: Once outnumbered basically lost, once losing by alot then basically gives up, bad teamate

Ric Flair:
pros: good tactics, pretty good mic skills, confident, gets along with others, poular

cons: annoying, can't put up a fight, old, pretty weak, anda just not great anymore, not that big (pretty small)

Ole anderson:
pros: Big, strong, disireble, wants to win, smart tactics

cons: not very athletic and doesn't understand what his opponents are trying to accomplish

Answer 8

1. They should of kept Kane w/ the mask on, it made him!!
2. Shawn Michaels is good because nobody can trust him, he can be good at one time then bad.
3.Goldberg could of been one of the greatest champs if they would of kept him.
4.Although i don't like him,he is one of the best wrestlers.
5.If this is Arn Anderson then he to is good.

Answer 9

1) him being masked years ago
his new character

2) incredible entertainer and wrestler
screwjob i guess i dont kno!

3) hmm never really observed him to know...

4) legend hall of famer
how hes still in WWE right now

5) dont know really

Answer 10

KANE PROS STRENGTH
CON LACKS TECHNICAL WRESTLING SKILLS

HBK PROS VERY ATHLETIC
CON EGO IS TOO BIG

GOLDBERG PROS STRENGTH
CONS HOW MANY DO YOU WANT EGO AND NO TALENT

FLAIR PROS WRESTLING ABILITY
CONS NOW HES TOO OLD

OLE PROS WRESTLING ABILITY
CONS WAS IN ARNS AND FLAIRS SHADOW