Granted they didn't do that well in the SEC this year, but wasn't he trying to build a team? Do you thin he should have been given a few more years. if they had beaten Mississippi stae would he still be there? 0-8 in the SEC is bad but look at the schedule and they did beat Northwestern State.
2007-11-24 07:46:01 · 6 answers · asked by R J 7 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I missed it Shannon , but i guess he did the fth down deal, if I can I'll email you issed all those games. Thanks
2007-11-25 06:20:28 · update #1
Because he was a disappointment like Callahan was at Nebraska.
2007-11-24 07:59:06 · answer #1 · answered by tfoley5000 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The multi-billion-dollar industry of major college football is "win now" or "gone tomorrow." Where coaches may have been given 4-6 years in the past, it can a maximum of three years to turn a lousy program into a winner.
The SEC record will be the justification, but what is the commitment by the administration to financially make the football program comparable with LSU, Georgia, Florida. Without the green it doesn't matter who is the head coach.
2007-11-24 07:56:29 · answer #2 · answered by Zombie Birdhouse 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oregeron should have been given a one year extension. Your new coach will reap the benefits of his work. Alabama screwed the pooch the same way...impatience.
2007-11-24 07:56:21 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
muck ole fiss. the supporters there think they should be contending for a national championship year after year...
too bad no one has explained the problem with that demand.
*_*
2007-11-24 08:14:32 · answer #4 · answered by BulldogBlitz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pretty much because of the SEC record
2007-11-24 07:49:54 · answer #5 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
did you watch the game? he completely embarrassed himself and the team. what he did in the 4th quarter was completely worthy of being fired.
2007-11-24 19:32:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋