English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgVDugSuPOo

This comes from of the English documentary "The Great Global Warming Swindle".

Many English schools are now forbidden from playing "An Inconvenient Truth" in classrooms. There are over 10 misleading mistakes in the movie and most of the "mistakes" look like they were put in the movie on purpose.

British Judge's ruling:
"Mr Gore's assertion that a sea-level rise of up to 20 feet would be caused by melting of ice in either West Antarctica or Greenland "in the near future". The judge said this was "distinctly alarmist" and it was common ground that if Greenland's ice melted it would release this amount of water - "but only after, and over, millennia".

Mr Gore's assertion that the disappearance of snow on Mount Kilimanjaro in East Africa was expressly attributable to global warming - the court heard the scientific consensus was that it cannot be established the snow recession is mainly attributable to human-induced climate change.

2007-11-24 05:34:54 · 8 answers · asked by a bush family member 7 in Politics & Government Politics

"Mr Gore's reference to a new scientific study showing that, for the first time, polar bears had actually drowned "swimming long distances - up to 60 miles - to find the ice". The judge said: "The only scientific study that either side before me can find is one which indicates that four polar bears have recently been found drowned because of a storm." "

2007-11-24 05:35:52 · update #1

8 answers

Don't baffle the global warming alarmists with real scientific facts. They are confused enough already. Oh, and according to their fearless leader, Al Gore, anyone who dares not accept his baloney, is tantamount to a holocaust denier or a flat Earth-er.

2007-11-24 05:41:01 · answer #1 · answered by booman17 7 · 3 2

Man this time last year it was practically 70 degrees all the way almost into Christmas. And that was in New York. It reached the 80s during a week in December. Last time a checked its winter in the northern hemisphere. Especially in the Northeast. Now if last year repeats itself...I doubt that its going to be just the weather having an affect. Remember with global warming, weather becomes more frequent or less frequent (depending upon geographic location). Seasons become longer and far more severe (as well as the weather). There will be a day when spring and fall no longer exist, just winter and summer. Hell its already starting. If there is one thing everyone must understand, our actions upon this world will not be reflected for some time possibly not for a century from now. If anything the cycle of nature on our planet is a slow one. But when change does occur it is very destructive and for the most part most life on this planet either adapts or dies out. Yet we are the only species that has the ability to change this planet at a unnatural pace. Those that don't even consider the implications of how humans can damage the planet are fools. Then again these are people who don't care about the future, because in the end, they could care less if humanity destroys the world in which it lives in and inevitably itself.

We have so much technology, the ability for alternate energies, stop hunger, cure diseases. But in the end everyone is to shallow to see the bigger picture. Our world is run by mass consumerism and the corporate world. I'm not against enjoying the nice things in life, but we could enjoy them at the same time in making a difference in the world we live in.

2007-11-24 14:15:42 · answer #2 · answered by Benny M 2 · 0 0

Actually that's why so many people are changing the name to "global climate change" because to many people were kicking them on the "Warming" part.

It's like "Liberal" becoming "progressive", new name old non-sense.

Fact is any one with an interest in history can go back and point to countless times dramatic and sudden climate changes have occurred and the vast majority happened before industrialization and "global warming".

despite the fact that people say the debate is over, it is not, it can not be over, there is too much evidence to the contrary and any one who says it is is just trying to silence criticism.

I applaud the British courts for not just buckling under pressure for once.

2007-11-24 14:02:10 · answer #3 · answered by Stone K 6 · 3 1

Being just north of chicago, I am wishing for global warming now... It's cold outside.

2007-11-24 13:41:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Holy Crap I'm moving to England.

2007-11-24 13:38:55 · answer #5 · answered by Richard Cranium 3 · 1 0

Global warming or not I still believe its a very good idea to lower polluting co2 emissions.

2007-11-24 13:45:54 · answer #6 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 1 3

The answer to your question, can be found here(watch them in order there are 5 parts):

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3642770827777355921&q=great+global+warming+swindle+swindle&total=126&start=20&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3642770827777355921&q=great+global+warming+swindle+swindle&total=126&start=20&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3642770827777355921&q=great+global+warming+swindle+swindle&total=126&start=20&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3642770827777355921&q=great+global+warming+swindle+swindle&total=126&start=20&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3642770827777355921&q=great+global+warming+swindle+swindle&total=126&start=20&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7

2007-11-24 14:10:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

because its winter time??

2007-11-24 13:38:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers