2007-11-24 05:13:28 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wow! And Hillary's always pointing fingers at other people screaming,"Right wing conspiracy!". She needs to be put in a mental hospital. I'm sure Bill would agree with me 100 percent.
2007-11-24 05:19:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Scandals are usually none related issues that take the eye off someone who the other party feels threatened by... I really don't think Hillary really wants to go down THAT road. But for now the threat of scandals seems to be working with the less educated.
2007-11-24 13:41:17 · answer #2 · answered by Ditka 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This is an old story from last week that didn't have any legs then, it's got less now. This story came from a political gossip columnist - Robert Novak I think his name is - and he's got less credibility than Bill O'Reilly, which is saying a lot. The conclusion was that he was fed this story from a Republican strategist to create more friction between Clinton and Obama. There is no evidence it came from the Clinton camp at all and both the Clinton and Obama camps disavow the story.
2007-11-24 14:07:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
They are the authors of "person destruction". There are many on this site that are too young to remember Pellicano and the secret police. The use of the IRS to go after churches and independent newspapers that disagreed publicly with them. Hillery had over 400 FBI files on people she perceived as their enemies. She had no idea how they got into the White House or into her possession. Each file she possessed is a felony. Scooter Libby got the ax, a trial and conviction for allegedly lying to Federal investigators. The Special Prosecutor that investigated White Water stated in his report to Congress that " Hillery Clinton was less than truthful with Federal investigators" So where is the outrage from all the Democrats that piled on Libby. It's in the Congressional record. They will try to ruin anyone that goes against them. It's in their history.
2007-11-24 13:33:01 · answer #4 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
they have done even better than you suggest. they have promised "not" to release scandalous information on obama.
this allows everyone to imagine the worst while hillary pretends to take the high ground.
obama has taken the best strategy. put up , or shut up.
2007-11-24 15:24:30 · answer #5 · answered by karl k 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You can bet if they have any dirt on him it will be leaked out and it will look as if it came from some where else.
so that would be a definite yes he best fess up and show hes at least a better man than Slick.
2007-11-24 13:19:09 · answer #6 · answered by CFB 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
The stuff on Obama is small in comparison to what the Clinton Opposition Research team has on Rudy Giuliani. Try pictures of him and his two gay housemates after wife #2 kicked him out of Gracey Mansion.
There's much more on Romney and Huck as well.
2007-11-24 13:25:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Wait until Shrillary gets broadsided { pun intended} from Rudy once Obama gets the Clinton Torture Treatment ! Her twisting in the wind will be soooo fun to see !
2007-11-24 13:27:29 · answer #8 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I believe Obama was doing just that the other day when he started talking about his drug exploits as a teen!
Well, I had drug exploits to, But I'm not running for president!
No, I'm not Hillery in disguse!
2007-11-24 13:25:39 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I'm not sure, I suppose that depends on if you trust news that comes from Robert Novak...not that there's anything wrong with exposing entire undercover CIA operations devoted to tracking WMD's, right?
2007-11-24 13:32:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋