English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

none.

2007-11-24 07:43:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

All Iran would need to do would be yo have a single nuclear missile strike Israel, and the country would be essentially wiped out.

Even if Israel really does have nuclear arms, which has never been proved, the best they could do in a second strike would not be sufficient to resurrect their country.

And for the asker to refer to Israel's "illicit" arms shows a lack of understanding of international law as well as of the survival instinct.

2007-11-24 05:44:01 · answer #2 · answered by Paperback Writer (real JPAA) 3 · 1 0

How do you know that it has 200 nukes and how do you know they are illegal?

(For the record, israel has not even acknowledged that they have even one, though it is widely understood that they have at least one.)

As for your question, it is quite silly.
And I will demonstrate how by asking the following question: "What thread can Al Queda possibly pose to the USA, a state armed with many nuclear weapons?"

In other words, Iran can be a threat to Israel, regardless of Israel's capacity to respond to that threat using the deadliest force known to mankind.

2007-11-24 13:46:13 · answer #3 · answered by BMCR 7 · 1 0

Illicit ?? Every Arab hard core Islamonazi nation wants israel wiped out...and the Israelis have limited resources to prevent it. Them having nukes is not illicit, but good defensive strategy.

As for Iran, now there's a perfect reason to HAVE nukes...considering the raghead mullas and the dwarf puppet in charge over there !

2007-11-24 04:52:53 · answer #4 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 4 1

It only takes one nuke to destroy a small country like Israel. And honestly when was the last time that Israel used a nuclear missile? I highly doubt once Iran gets nuclear technology they will use the same restraint.

2007-11-24 04:51:15 · answer #5 · answered by arkainisofphoenix 3 · 4 1

As small as Israel is ,it wouldn't take but 1 or2 bombs to destroy it ,especially if hit first,then that would establish an Islamic govt.in that area to add to the Empire that the Muslims want

2007-11-24 05:15:13 · answer #6 · answered by G D [Shorty] m 2 · 1 0

Israel needs more land and it needs more people to be afraid. Iran doesn't need more land, the people are great, but they have a looney leader with no power to do anything.

2007-11-24 05:00:30 · answer #7 · answered by ToYou,Too! 5 · 1 0

This is an absurd question. Israel has never vowed to "wipe anyone off the map".. Any theocratic government, especially a radical Islamic one, cannot be trusted. Any government that brainwashes children with ideologocal hatred and the desire to kill themselves out of love of their faith, has a sickness.. Do you ever notice these Muslim leaders say that martyrdom to Islam is no greater honor to their faith, yet they don't do it themselves? Teenagers hitting puberty are promised 72 virgins for killing themselves. Ironic? No..Evil, manipulative and hardly honorable. Ask another silly question

2007-11-24 04:57:22 · answer #8 · answered by goo_garglin_libtard 1 · 4 1

just see what the HEZBOLLAH guerrilla had done than you will understand what threat can Iran shows to Israel!

2007-11-24 05:15:43 · answer #9 · answered by ayubchy 5 · 1 0

Ah, but Israel has never used one. The batshit crazy leadership of Iran will undoubtedly supply one to Hammas or some other terrorist faction that will use it on Israel if they get the bomb.

2007-11-24 04:48:12 · answer #10 · answered by booman17 7 · 5 2

And yet they have never used one. Do you honestly think that Iran will show the same restraint. Well, you probably do but not those of us that depend on reason.

2007-11-24 04:47:54 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers