So if Bush said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman..." we'd have to believe him because Clinton said it too?
Or does it only work when he lies about WMD?
"Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."
2007-11-24 04:17:27 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hans Blix didn't think so Jeff.
2007-11-24 04:20:55 · update #1
Boomer, did those inspectors ever find anything?
2007-11-24 04:25:43 · update #2
Clinton lied about sexual relations. Bush lied about WMD's.
Clinton's lie didn't kill anyone.
Bush's lie is continuing to kill people.
2007-11-24 04:22:52 · answer #1 · answered by Dan H 7 · 6⤊ 4⤋
No, brother, you're missing the whole scam.....
The president never actually wanted to attack Iraq, but the poor guy was tricked into it by those nasty, scheming democrats who made speech after speech saying Saddamn had all these weapons, apparently knowing the whole time that these were lies, just to trick George Bush into doing something he never would otherwise have done.
Yeah, that's it, it was entrapment! The dirty rotten democrats entrapped our honest, kind, and moral president, just like that mean, closed-minded policeman did to that senator in the airport bathroom.
2007-11-24 12:44:47 · answer #2 · answered by oimwoomwio 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There was no lie. WMDs were found and a captured general of Saddam's admitted that the majority was sent to Syria when the UN was trying to make up their minds about attacking Iraq.
2007-11-24 13:55:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Once again,there were weapons given up by Lebanon the first week of the war,by Momar Quaddafi,second the Hesbollah movement was attacked about 4 months ago by Israel for putting missles along its border(some had nuclear componenets,thats why Israel attacked them,found out later after the attack) Where do you think these weapons came from,after all We did give Saddam about a month and a half warning before we came in
2007-11-24 12:24:31 · answer #4 · answered by stygianwolfe 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Just maybe we ought to gain some perspective instead of spouting off one line rhetoric. It amazes me how certain some of us are despite never setting foot in one CIA meeting.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200401/pollack
http://www.cnn.com/US/9812/16/clinton.iraq.speech/
2007-11-27 17:06:11 · answer #5 · answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The entire world thought the same things. Including liberals like yourself.
2007-11-24 12:20:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Obviously Saddam had WMDs - check out the genocide photos of the Kurds he annihilated after the first Gulf War. It's probable that the WMDs were smuggled out of Iraq and into Syria, Iran, etc. before the current war began. It's easy to hide things in the desert sand. BTW - everyone lies at some point in their lives, and yes, it is wrong.
2007-11-24 12:24:29 · answer #7 · answered by Susan 1 · 4⤊ 7⤋
UN kept sending the inspectors back and forth to Iraq for fun???
2007-11-24 12:21:58 · answer #8 · answered by Boomer 4 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Bill Clinton is a sack of crap. So is Bush
2007-11-24 12:25:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
lmao lieing about a bj is totally different from lieing about wmds to invade a country u can't even compare the two,there not in the same ballpark,not even in the same league.nobody died from a bj.yes obviously they had then but didn't when we invaded for having these wmds when we have ourselves.and if he did have them didn't u think he would have used them against the "evil invading american infidels".if he had them he would have used them against us because he hates us
2007-11-24 12:23:19 · answer #10 · answered by tyler "god of typos" 5 · 5⤊ 4⤋