English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

lets be realistic and sane.

2007-11-24 02:30:33 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

36 answers

About 2% of liberals believe this... let's just get a big brush and paint all libs the same colour why don't you...

2007-11-24 02:36:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 10 6

only the 'realistic and sane' can see that the WTC was brought down in a controlled demolition - and that is not politically partisan .

Those who call themselves anti-war overwhemingly support pro-war candidates e.g Clinton -just and those who call themselves conservative overwhelming support Globalist, Trotskyite 'neo-cons'.


The only thing that is certain is the vast majority of both are brainwashed sheeple voting for different wings of the same NWO War Party-- that idea alone scares them into running back to the flock - to bleat "conspiracy nuts" whenever their worldview is threatened by facts.

2007-11-24 06:35:21 · answer #2 · answered by celvin 7 · 0 0

No President was behind 9/11..Clinton dropped the ball and had several chances to take out Bin-Laden for lack of credible intelligence he chose not to and as we all know that was the wrong move.So in short the real person to blame is Jimmy Carter who gutted the C.I.A. so inteligence has been weak since..

2007-11-24 02:48:11 · answer #3 · answered by flacrzy2 2 · 5 1

Gustooch,
Could you define realistic and sane first?
Not all liberals believe this conspiracy theory; believing that they do, is maybe not so sane and realistic.

2007-11-24 03:38:35 · answer #4 · answered by mchlmybelle 6 · 1 1

I'm not a liberal and Ive read and studied all the photos and theories about 911. Some are way out there but some have a kernel of truth to them. Ive seen the video its a blur and whatever it is a drone or whatever is like 10 feet off the ground. The hole in the pentagon is far to small to have been made by a 737 and who are all the guys in suits picking up plane parts? The parts were not much bigger than a Cessna. Where were the passengers, seats and luggage?Why did the "737" hit a virtually unoccupied part of the building? Why was the surveillance video from the gas station across the street seized and not released to the public? These are lingering questions ones not easily asked or thought about. But still the questions linger and they need to be answered. Anyone remember the Gulf of Tonkin 'supposed' incidence? That was Johnson and the liberals war Vietnam. Sometimes the truth is ugly and painful to reveal.

2007-11-24 02:55:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 7

You can't stop it. You see, 25% of all Americans are retarded.

Cartman: So you're saying that by believing this, one-fourth of all Americans are retarded?

Stan: Yea dude, at least one fourth.

Kyle: Well, let's see, there's four of us, and you're retarded! So, yea, one fourth!

Now that isn't to say that I stand behind or trust George (junior or otherwise), I just think saying that our administration MADE it happen is pretty whacked out. Allowed it? Maybe.

Remember that people bombing Muslim synagogues in NYC in the 70's started all this crap... sorta.

The fact is, there are far, far too many factors in this issue of the West vs the Middle East, to say nothing of the Middle East vs the Middle east, to wrap ANYTHING up in one nice, neat package. World events have never been, nor are they ever, that simple.

There were all sorts of theories behind the political/social/military collapse of Rome. Now, beyond access to all manner of ease and vice, we're starting to look at the fact that all their water came in lead pipes.

Nature (and therefore politics and world events) works in a very complex manner. It is NEVER NEVER NEVER one event, but a number of events, in serial.

2007-11-24 07:17:23 · answer #6 · answered by eine kleine nukedmusik 6 · 0 1

Bush was behind 9/12 and maybe 9/13 but never 9/11.. That was osama bin laden and his people and ONLY them.. I thought everyone knew that. Geez people actually need to blame the victim to make sense of it? There was no sense in it so get over it.

2007-11-24 02:47:24 · answer #7 · answered by Ditka 7 · 6 1

Actually, it isn't just liberals. A lot of them are people that -correctly- have large mistrust in the government, but are misinformed. I don't think it was an inside job, but unfortunately the administration used it to get into Iraq, which has turned out to be a bittersweet, half-trillion dollar money pit. =-(

2007-11-24 03:16:16 · answer #8 · answered by Ron Paul 2112 4 · 0 1

If you really believe in being realistic and sane, then you'll have to admit that individual opinion is not solely based on political leanings. Not all liberals believe Bush was behind 911 and not all conspiracy theorists are liberals. I don't happen to believe he was behind it, so what does that make me?

2007-11-24 02:39:51 · answer #9 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 5 4

Not all Liberals believe that garbage. Some just repeat it because they hate Bush so much, and lunitics like Rosie O'Donnell spout that stupidity on the air. The "Jerry's" from Conspiracy Theory of the world, are the nut jobs who chant it like a mantra.

2007-11-24 02:41:06 · answer #10 · answered by booman17 7 · 5 3

No, these people are clearly whacked. It would be near impossible for the nutso facto crowd to see through all the smoke they've chosen to indulge themselves in.

2007-11-24 05:19:16 · answer #11 · answered by wider scope 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers