English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

this site discusses that the knowledge, the essence, the sciences, the absolute will have to have a non verbal component. this non verbal component makes the objectivity about the essence, the knowledge, the god, the world, the sciences etc. impossible. so all the knowledge is bound to be subjective ultimately.

is this unknowability the destiny of all knowledge? what do you say?
the url is

http://www.lightinlife.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=77&Itemid=105

2007-11-23 22:43:05 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

2 answers

The Franciscan William of Ockham, famous for "Ockham's Razor," said it best. He said there is no theological argument for, nor scientific proof of, God's existence, and that a belief must be based entirely on faith.
It is still true all these years later.

2007-11-23 23:21:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i would say no, all knowledge is not subjective

i can see a tree with fruit on it, i can eat the fruit, i can analyze if the fruit serves its purpose, did it fill my hunger need? did i have negative physical symptoms?
i would base my thought on those two things, not on the taste, the appearance,

i am able to view it objectively, and while perhaps having prior concepts, i would not let them influence my viewpoint,
yes we approach everything with our own personal pre-concepts, its when we can go beyond those, and be objective, that we move beyond the subjective, and i think many people are capable of doing that
i do agree that in the area of religions and concepts of God, the subjective comes into play much more then the objective

2007-11-24 08:09:18 · answer #2 · answered by dlin333 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers