a hypothetical question?

Question

if the WWIII starts tomorrow and assuming that it doesn't start by using nukes; how would USA move it's troops and/or military towards Russia? Hitler used Iran in order to transport it's military to fight Russia. Reza Shah of Iran collaborated with Hitler thinking that he was going to win and betraying England whom he owned his power to!

Answer 1

I'll be damn, then that's why, Allies took over Iran, and sent Reza Shah to exile , i think to Morris island, where he passed.
That Churchill ?

Best Regards.

Answer 2

This is of course assuming Russia and the USA would be on opposing sides. At this point that is a large assumption.

My bet on a probable WWIII situation is in Iran, not Russia. In that senario, I believe Russia would be a tactical ally to Iran, but I don't believe the USA would fight Russia directly. I don't think the governements of Russia or the USA want to fight one another. They know each others capabilities too well.

If however the USA and Russia were to fight a war against one another, I don't think you have to look any farther than Iraq, Turkey and Eastern Europe (Poland) The USA already has troops in Southern Asia, the Middle East and Europe. It doesn't seem far fetched to think that the USA would try a frontal assault from Europe and a flanking front from the Middle East and Southern Asia. With bombing routes over Canada, The North Pole and Alaska.

Answer 3

Assuming it isn't nuclear...at least with huge, powerful bombs capable of destroying the world...George Bush would first bomb Iran, using his bases in Iraq. Any war will really be nuclear, because the "Divine" weapon's research has designed nuclear weapons that encompass smaller areas. This has been the plan from the beginning...first Iraq, then Iran. Our occupation of Iraq give us a huge supply of the oil needed for him to conduct the war.

It is believed that Iran will be easy to conquer, what with the military might of the United States and the fact that it is believed that God is on our side and is delighted at the thought of more war. Then, from the vantage point of our position in Iran, any objection from Russia will be easy to reach.

The problem here is with China. When China sees the U.S. grabbing a good part of the world's oil supply, will it join Russia in such a war?

It is naive to assume that the other countries of the world will sit back and allow the U.S. to take over a major section of the world's oil supply. Both Russia and China are customers of Iranian oil. There was a stunned silence with Iraq, but their resentment is smoldering and dangerous. With the Bush record of unintelligent decisions, one can only hope that he will refrain from causing World War III.

Answer 4

What makes so certain WW3 would be America against Russia? Look at all of the enemies our government has made for us...
Korea, Viet-nam, Cambodia, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Iran, just to name a few. Have you forgotten that the American Government has had serious campaigns against at least 22 other countries? What makes you so sure that not one of those still thinks about vengeance? I can virtually promise that the 3rd world war will not only involve biologcal and chemical weapons... but it will also go nuclear. A 3rd WW is highly not advisable.

Answer 5

Considering how the USA has thinned out its military, NATO would have to play a pivitol role in this regard. Afterall , thats what the organization was ratified for. To offset a military strike from the past USSR.

Answer 6

Delta.