English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Sexuality, if it is left to itself, as it is in the case of other species, other forms of life, is merely a biological need, because the living organism has this object to survive and produce one like itself. Anything you superimpose on that is totally unrelated to the living organism. But we have turned that, what we call sexual activity, which is biological in its nature, into a pleasure movement. I am not saying anything against the pleasure movement. It has become possible for us to have sex at any time we want through the help of thought.

And Love There must be two, you know. I love somebody and somebody else loves me. Wherever there is division, there can't be love. We are trying to bridge this gap, which is horrible for us, which has no meaning, which is demanding something from us, with this fancy idea that there must be love between these two individuals.
When once love fails to establish the perfectly ideal relationship between two individuals, what we are left with is hate

2007-11-23 19:59:44 · 20 answers · asked by The More I learn The More I'm Uneducated 5 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

20 answers

Man comes from woman, and spends the rest of his life trying to get back in!
I agree with you that love and sex are two different things. Sex belongs to you, love does not. As a creator you can make love, but you cannot claim it.
In order for the river of love to pass through, there can be no thought. Sex requires thought. However, at the climax of sex between two people when no thought is possible, in that moment love happens. A merger takes place, and they literally together become one in love.

2007-11-24 04:45:29 · answer #1 · answered by Monk 6 · 4 0

I'm a little unsure of your 'perfectly ideal relationship' idea. Do you mean the 'mating of minds' i.e. when both fall in love with each other, Or when its mating at physical levels too? Anyway, I disagree with you when you say love turns to hate only because it could not find a similar echo in another's heart. That kind of love is totally shallow and selfish. Did Meera stop loving Krishna because he was never with her and it was all in her own imagination? (Hindu mythology). Okay that's an extreme example. But if you really truly love someone and it's not returned (for whatever reasons) you will still care for the welfare of that person. It may sadden you a great deal but it cannot turn into hate only because it was unrequited.

2007-11-23 21:02:52 · answer #2 · answered by P'quaint! 7 · 1 0

Of course. There is a path of love through sex. But it must be in wild utter abandonment to the beloved, in this case your partner. Giving oneself fully and receiving the skin, flesh, bones and marrow of the other. The bonding of yin/yang in sacred sex is a most supreme way. Through sexual alchemy the magic that happens between the beloved and beloved is the union once again of the cosmos, such bliss. However the knots of the conditioned mind must be untied and with this untying more energy is freed for the Kundalini to rise higher, and higher. But what better way to untie them than this very, very powerful force of the sex drive.

The religious have destroyed most all the Tantra's of this way, however this Tantra the body remembers when given a push into heightened awareness.

2007-11-24 07:50:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Most love kinds do not require sex, and I don't need to give examples of that, you know that already....but the typical love you are talking about does require sex, but that too post-marital. Because marriage is a connection that strengthens the bond of love and sex a course of nature through which every mammal goes through having in consideration of human ethics as opposed to other beings.

2016-05-25 04:41:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Cycling a thing down at high shift likely results in a crash. The reason breeding is so complex is because the female evolved to suppress itself from breeding until it is quite sure that the male will provide for her offspring. Rules of engagement, the greater part of childbearing has to be beared by the males and females working together, if the female is not confident of the male, then they will not breed. So the inflated scene you described is just the mid life crisis of a sex behavior.

2007-11-24 10:13:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

To paraphrase a line from "À Bout de Soufle": Sex is a form of Love & Love is a form of Sex.

I do not feel that unrequitted love irrefutably turns to hate. The hate, in these cases, becomes a way of coping with the insecurity incurred by rejection. If one could find a way of focusing that hazy shade of hate into a sharpened hope of finding another who will love us as we are, then perhaps unrequitted love would become a way of forcing one to love themself with a passionate fury.

2007-11-23 20:29:00 · answer #6 · answered by ___ 5 · 3 0

there is a story in Greek mythology. it says that people used to be one (man and woman). they had 2 heads, one in front and one on their back, four hands and legs. because they were very strong Zeus was afraid of them and decided to separate them. when that happened the pain was horrible and from that day they started searching for their missing part. even that this is just a story it could explain our Passion about loving and be loved. it s an endless road for someones but it s a road full of moments. it s worth trying to experience sex and love at the same time and it shouldn t leave us hate when it doesn t comes out because their is so many possibilities out there as the number of humans there are born on earth

2007-11-23 20:35:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Okay.

Ask a question or explain your expected answer. It is impolite to do both.

Love has nothing to do with your explanation.

Sex does.

Great love is possible without sex. Sex is possible without love.

If it were not for sex we would not exist.

Without love there is no reason for us to exist.

Do not try to be so tricky. If you want sex then have it. If you want to exist then do not try to be so tricky.

You are alive because of sex.

Love is quite different.

2007-11-23 21:09:44 · answer #8 · answered by Temple 5 · 1 0

Love does not consist of gazing at each other, but in looking together in the same direction. ~Antoine de Saint-Exupery
if both are thinking sex then yes. there is definetly possibility for the relation between the two.

2007-11-23 20:11:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

LOVE is related to GOD.
love is related to everything in the universe.
The universe is existing under the umbrella of love.
Love is dedication for every thing and anything.
Love is an exchange of pleasure ,happiness and sorrows etc.
Human body is sacred creation of GOD.
In love there is full dedication,the warm relation ship.
Shall we single out one organ of the body from enjoying the warm of love ?
We are enjoying by shaking hands,
Seeing friends and relatives,
Hearing good news.
Love is related to everything ,like wise love shall related to sex,is a dedication unto the last for each other as enjoined by GOD.

2007-11-23 20:34:52 · answer #10 · answered by ahmed k 5 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers