English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Ron Paul

2007-11-23 17:20:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

ooo, tough one....they're like the parallels of eachother on different parties....probably Kucinich. But if Hillary get the nom (which i doubt she will) I'll vote republican if Paul gets the nom too.

stc, you're wrong because the constitution is at the heart of a constitutional republic. And what country is there to defend if there's no constitution? Well, you can lead a horse to water.

2007-11-24 01:24:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Kuccinich. His wife Elizabeth is smoking hot.

2007-11-24 01:22:11 · answer #3 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 0 2

Either one's fine with me. Neither are neoconservative communists, neither are members of the CFR or any other rightwing think tanks, and neither want to destroy this nation and implement a stalinist regime like the neocon communists.

For those Republicans who plan to vote in 2008, please investigate the communist backgrounds of your neoconservative friends before you vote.

2007-11-24 14:22:22 · answer #4 · answered by Monkey M 2 · 0 1

Since they are both morons that I don't trust with a dime or a potato gun, I will still write in my own name for president and the name of someone I know living in another state (Constitutional requirement) for vice president.

2007-11-24 01:22:22 · answer #5 · answered by Lonnie P 7 · 0 4

I think national security would be a concern with Kucinich -- though I'd like somebody to show me I'm wrong.

2007-11-24 01:22:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Gotta be Dennis. Not that either one would make it past the primaries, though.

2007-11-24 01:23:13 · answer #7 · answered by Fretless 6 · 0 3

I'd have to be on Mars to vote for either one of them.

2007-11-24 01:20:02 · answer #8 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers