I believe Hillary knew what Bill was doing and allowed it as long as he helped her in her career. She probably told him to not let it go public or embarrass her. I believe she is with him so he can help her get elected.
2007-11-23 15:46:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Just my opinion 5
·
2⤊
5⤋
If you think staying in a hugely troubled marriage and doing the hard work it takes to save a marriage like that is weak, you are very foolish. It takes a heck of a lot more strength than calling a divorce attorney. You'll have to find another reason she isn't suitable for President, this one sucks. There is a long history of American Presidents who stayed and suffered in extremely dysfunctional marriages. Somehow, it did not affect their capability when it came to running a country. There is no reason to assume any differently when it comes to Sen. Clinton.
2007-11-23 16:12:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sometimes people actually love one another and will work through even the worst of problems. Sen. Clinton loves Bill and he loves her...its way too complex for any ditto-head to understand. Also, she believed that her country didn't need a president that was going through a divorce situation. Anyway, isn't 'working it out' a family value?
2007-11-23 15:52:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Noah H 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
People who have good marriages work out their problems and stay together.
People who really love each other give them another chance.
People are human and make mistakes. Clinton is NOT the only President to have an affair you know. Look it up.
Don't tell me you never make mistakes. Have you ever done something to someone and needed another chance? I bet you have. Think before you bash others. Hillary is actually the strong one. People who divorce over every little thing are the weak ones.
I'm not voting for Hillary for President. The Monika affair is not the reason why. It's who is paying for her presidential campaign is why and our medical problems will not stop because of it.
2007-11-23 15:47:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tara662 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
Yes, she is to weak to be President. But think about it. Why did Hillary put up with the humiliation? Bill must have some dirt on her. She has done some dirty deeds. I won't elaborate. If you or some of these who answer. Don't watch the news and research about her. Then you must not want to know. But it is something very deep. Someday, the cat will come out of bag.
2007-11-23 16:00:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sasha 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
She's an idiot. So is he. Maybe they were maybe they were made for eachother. And you're right she is way too weak and to stupid to be our president. I'm sorry but it's all so true. She's a communist and her college thesis was on socialism which is a form of communism now tell me she's not screwed up in the head. Most liberals are brain damaged though not all but most. They think every thing is our (Republican's) fault. Which is so not true. Now she's running for president? That's a scarry thought. Sorry venting I had a bad day.
2007-11-23 15:40:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by rain_walker7 2
·
5⤊
4⤋
She believes in the covenant of marriage that she swore before God.
Unlike others.
2007-11-23 16:21:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I have seen many marriages, past and present, that have survived through infidelity and other issues. You have got to be kidding me that you are judging her by her marriage and not by her issues.
What is your life like? Is your marriage perfect? Anything you hiding in the closet? If you don't like those personal questions, then stay out of her marriage and bedroom, and stick to the issues that concerns the country...
By the way, many Republican politicians had affairs. Why aren't you talking about them?
Get a clue...
2007-11-23 15:53:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
Well, according to the Clinton's (at least one time) alleged religion of Christianity, infidelity is the only grounds for divorce, so it can't be because she doesn't believe in divorce.
If she had divorced him, would she be running for President right now? No, because she wouldn't have won the senate races.
2007-11-23 15:37:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
6⤊
4⤋
First, she got a stepping stone Senate seat, then a campaign for President. If she wants to cash in on Slick Willie's political contacts, she had to keep him around.
Add in Slicko's devastation to his "legacy" if she dropped him while in office. However, watch her 86 this clown when she loses next November...within 1 year of the loss.
2007-11-23 15:37:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by commanderbuck383 5
·
7⤊
3⤋