Did we loose the Forgotten War, the war in Afghanistan?

Question

Opium crops are out of control and the some say the Taliban is back in control.

LOL I'm so dumb.

LOSE!!! LOL

Answer 1

Well, what was the story they fed us? They said we were trying to get Bin Ladin. They said we were only days behind him at times...It's well known that MUCH more military resources are alocated in Iraq than Afghanistan. So think abou this: as soon as people got so fed up at the lack of progress on the head hunt for Osama...we capture Saddam#12. As if that's supposed to be some serogate revenge for 9/11...and America stops worrying about Osama. We haven't captured Bin Laden because that wasn't the real goal of occupying Afghanistan. Opium is just as lucrative as oil, and even better for our military, they can sell it in abundance to China.

Answer 2

The Taliban is not totally in control. They control less than 1/4 of Afghanistan. That's better than when they controlled 100%.

Unfortunately, those Taliban fanatic crazies will be around forever to some degree or another.

Answer 3

Iraq always was going to fail, as everyone in the world, plus half of America, knew. Of course, it did not have to be the complete and catastrophic failure (it could have been just your everyday “whoops, we invaded the wrong country” kind of mistake) that resulted from Bush’s ignorance, incompetence, arrogance, bigotry, and religious convictions.

Afghanistan, on the other hand, was a great opportunity wasted. The Afghans actually wanted to be our friends and wanted us to help them restore and rebuild their country. If we had been committed (as Bush assured them we were) to go after Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, and to finish what we started in Afghanistan, we could have shown the world – by our actions – that: (1) we really are the good guy; (2) you can trust us and believe what we say; and, (3) we do have the practical power and societal strength to accomplish great deeds and improve the lives of people everywhere.

Instead, we (once again) broke our promises; turned our back on friends and allies, and abused our power, lied, and cheated our way to a position where we are proven hypocrites who have a lower approval rating than China.

Answer 4

Apparently so. Bush seems to be attention deficient - I think he's forgotten that Afghanistan is where Osama bin laden and the terrorist live and that the whole point was to dismantle the Taliban and capture Osama. But...then....he might have just gotten a whiff of oil in Iraq.....

Answer 5

Well you could ask if we could have won it in the first place that's not the same but the same as Africa until we have a full and complete understanding of the culture and people all we're doing is searching and taking up space...and that does have to do how you define the word win. I would like to think our troops aren't dying for anything though

Answer 6

IT is not easy to win a war.win the people to win the war.we failed to win the people of the land.tactics is the best weapon to win the war than armory and guns and bombs. Retaliations carried out to teach a lesson.apart from that there was not any good intention for the people of Afghanistan or the world. well that is the way I see it

Answer 7

i understand you're unlikely to look after my answer, yet i might desire to indicate out some issues in this so stated as conflict on terror. human beings say there is no thank you to win a conflict against a spiritual based ideology nor an enemy that blends in with the the remainder of the cultures. this theory rather isn't actual. the folk of the u . s . are in basic terms no longer keen to do what it takes to rid the planet of those terrorist. That being salary the conflict precisely like WWII, huge dying and destruction. those terrorists weren't the 1st to fly airplanes into aims and blow themselves up in basic terms to kill others. the eastern did precisely the comparable element throughout WWII. the eastern had precisely the comparable concept of their heads that they might circulate to a particular place in heaven in the event that they sacrificed their lives to kill the enemy. interior the final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days of the conflict in Europe, in basic terms the Allied aerial bombing on my own killed almost seven-hundred,000 civilians in Germany and left hundreds of hundreds homeless. this way of dying and destruction is what takes the desire to salary conflict out of the inhabitants of the enemy. This surgical conflict they're attempting to salary against terror won't artwork. All that is going to do is convey extra human beings into the enemy's fold. the middle-east, fairly the radical international places like Iran, Syria, Jorden, Pakistan, and mayeb even Saudi Arabia, would desire to be bombed into the stone age. each city needs to be leveled. huge civilian deaths would desire to happen. basically this way will the folk of that section desire peace, in basic terms using fact the eastern did after some atoms bombs fell from the sky. the folk of the u . s . will no longer be able to stay with that lots dying on their hands, even however.

Answer 8

GW only went into Afghanistan in an attempt to legitimise him going into Iraq. He couldn't care less.

Answer 9

I guess, but i hear about it once in a while. I honestly believe that if everyone use google earth we could find America's most wanted. LOL

Answer 10

The Forgotten war was Korea