No, it most certainly would not be Saudi Arabia, even though the vast majority of the 9/11 hijackers AND a lot of the funnelled money that is funding internation terrorism originated in the Saudi kingdom. The Saudi royals and the Bush family are simply too cozy with each other for their respective nations to engage in armed conflict.
However, there is another oil producing country in THIS hemisphere that is being led by another vehemently anti-US "nutcase," once the target of a botched coup. That nation is the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. That anti-American "nutcase" is Senor Presidente Hugo Chavez.
2007-11-23 11:59:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
No not saudi arabia. Saudi is at friendly terms with the US and has been supporting the US both directly and indirectly throughout both gulf wars.
Plus Saudi Arabia just made a huge weapons deal with Russia, and they have a well prepared army so bombing SA is even more suicidal than bombing Iraq.
Technically, SA is a member of the GCC. Members include Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, and Qatar among others, and in a way, they behave as a group economically and politacally. And theyre all with good terms with the US. I would Imagine you would involve GCC alliances in a war against SA. (Iraq is not member GCC).
And remember USA's is after this so called "terrorism" thing and none of it is coming from SA, or at least not as much as Afganistan and Iraq.
I think they would go after African Diamonds or North Korean Nukes...
2007-11-23 11:54:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by geetar 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't think the United States will ever attack Iran unless they do something imprudent like deploy nuclear missiles. The only country likely to be attacked by the US at this time is one that is providing safe haven for Osama bin Laden. Even then it would be a covert, surgical strike, and only after diplomatic demands to turn him over fail. If that country happens to be yours, so be it.
2007-11-23 13:06:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by ok_ranger 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Iran and North Korea... Die to the last man or woman? Loyal? Are you in a parallel universe? North Korea can't even keep the lights on. The youth in Iran hate their leader.
2016-05-25 03:43:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
When they attack Iran the rest of the world will likely get involved and they can do their colonizing while blaming the rest of the world.
If for some strange reason the rest of the world does not defend itself when the U.S. attacks Iran, Syria is definitely next. If they can get Mush to let them help guard his nukes so that they can seize them prior to an attaack then Pakistan is after Syria.
What does the number 322 represent to them?
2007-11-23 11:51:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Guardian 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Hm, yes the war couldn't POSSIBLY be about taking out a tyrannical dictator who committed genocide on his people? It couldn't POSSIBLY be about establishing a democracy in a country whose previous "leader" cared nothing for his people except how many of them he could torture in one day. It couldn't POSSIBLY be about establishing military, government, economic, financial, education, and medical aid to the Iraqi Civilians nor our brave men and women risking their lives and even dieing to protect said people. No, it couldn't POSSIBLY be about that! Quit listening to the liberal media who are intent on spewing the least amount of truth possible just to get support to pull out of Iraq. Research before you ask a question like this, please.
"Assistance has helped Iraq move away from rote learning methodology in decrepit, unsanitary classrooms to interactive learning in rehabilitated buildings. Since 2003, USAID has rehabilitated nearly 3,000 schools. Over 20 million new textbooks have been supplied by USAID (8.6 million) and UNESCO (12 million). Tens of thousands of primary school teachers have received training and technical assistance."
2007-11-23 14:48:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by K.K. 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I do not believe that there will be anything left of America after war with Iran which will be WW III. Russians and Chinese will beat the s**t out of the US if US will atack Iran.
2007-11-23 11:55:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I love Planters Peanuts hown bout you?Maybe we should invade whomever grows the most peanuts.
2007-11-23 18:04:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by ak6702 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
North Korea, the others have too much economic power.
2007-11-23 12:57:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
North Korea would be good. Kim Jong Il's head would look good on a stick.
2007-11-23 12:28:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋