English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't think so.

2007-11-23 08:42:05 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

8 answers

As long as that someone is made of inflatable plastic, it's okay. That is after all what they are made for. :)~

2007-11-23 08:45:23 · answer #1 · answered by Trina™ 6 · 1 0

what's the point?
Isn't right and wrong a function of society and cultural thinking? Doesn't each society deem what is right and wrong within their own society? In the American society you should expect some form of social vengeance by way of the legal system if you do something deemed 'illegal'. It doesn't really have anything to do with the idea of 'necessity' which is what nature drives. It may not be socially acceptable to human beings but many forms of nature eat their young and their mates. Human society forces a value on that idea because of fear. Nature adds no value definition and does it because it is necessary.

If it was necessary to 'blow someone up' in nature then nature would do it. Whether you view it as right or wrong is irrelevant.

2007-11-23 17:00:03 · answer #2 · answered by @@@@@@@@ 5 · 0 0

That begs the question, "Is there right and wrong?"

Technically, there isn't. However, there is a 'path of logic' that humans try to distinguish. That 'path of logic' denigrates such an act as 'not right,' or 'not productive.'

2007-11-23 16:56:52 · answer #3 · answered by krneel128 3 · 0 0

i love it when nimrods say that there is no right and wrong. it's all relative and if it's right for you then it's right for you and if it is right for me then it is right for me.

so...

if i decided to break into your house, steal all your stuff, burn it down and then rape your wife, daughter and sister. it is right for me because it is right for me. what? you're angry? why? it was right for me. what the heck does it have to do with it being right for you? it's relative and subjective and 'technically' there is no right or wrong.

i found it to be very 'productive' and well within the 'path of logic'. for example: 'i like your flat screen lcd through the window, i want it. i went to get it.' it would be very productive to obtain your lcd tv for free. oh, and apply the same 'path of logic' to the other stuff too. why? because it is 'technically' 'right' in my world...and not necessarily yours.

try and prove me wrong with your logic.

btw dude, no, it is WRONG to blow someone up that's unless you're with mr 'technically'.

2007-11-23 17:03:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

There are few problems that can not be effectively dealt with through the proper application of high explosives.

2007-11-23 18:34:59 · answer #5 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 1 0

Yes!

2007-11-23 17:23:27 · answer #6 · answered by charles g 2 · 0 0

Yes, everyone diserves to live, God should choose the time you leave not humans

2007-11-23 16:47:35 · answer #7 · answered by Mal777 6 · 0 1

depends on point of view

2007-11-23 17:55:38 · answer #8 · answered by poke 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers