when they go into buildings to show the security breeches,take photos in resticted buildings why are they not charged?
2007-11-23 08:35:20 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
filya puta has been reported for the racist remark haggis muncher
2007-11-24 05:50:29 · update #1
.this type of reporting is stupid,I would place them in custody if security was breached, or if they committed trespass in any way,anything to get a story, that is the order of the day with these individuals,Why don't people who find these reporters on their property douse them with cold water? I think they would soon get the message.
2007-11-23 09:16:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The reporters in Vietnam had unfettered get right of entry to and actual pronounced on the conflict, for this reason turning public sentiment against the conflict. The pentagon found out from that mistake and now retains reporters secure the place they might't surely learn what's occurring. That way the defense force gets to regulate the concepts popping out of the conflict area. If the reporters have been allowed to rfile on the atrocities we dedicate daily there could be rioting in the streets to offer up the wars.
2016-09-30 01:26:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The reporters are actually helping us. Its too bad that they have to do what should be the Bush administration's job in making sure we are safe. They are highlighting the fact that the Bush administration is actually doing nothing to protect us. Nothing is ever going to be perfect, but if there are too many security lapses it will be a lot easier for terrorists to attack us. I'm sure anyone interested in a terrorist attack will know about these breaches without the media reporting on it. Making things public will hopefully shame those in charge into fixing the problems.
2007-11-23 09:14:43 · answer #3 · answered by Alan S 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They done it recently in a prison too and all locks and combinations had to be changed.
It's either a damn lack of common sense or they do it on purpose to see if the outcome can make a story.
They should be charged.
2007-11-23 08:43:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
This is the media that hollers loudest when " their Rights" are affected but see nothing wrong with impairing our rights.It appears we have no "rights" in their view and can do anything they damn well please even if it means destroying our security . Start by getting all your friends to boycott the paper, write the editors, hound the television media to expose these b------s for what they are LEECHES!!
2007-11-23 08:55:27 · answer #5 · answered by googie 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
How much would you like to charge them haggis muncher?
2007-11-23 09:58:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
because they do more good than harm!! they highlight security lapses that can then be closed and as the first thing the reporter does is make it public it makes it bit difficult to press charges
2007-11-23 08:44:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
why don't we just show the terrorist how to beat the security on the internet and TV
right that is what they did.
duh
2007-11-23 17:03:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because its a load of $hit half the time.
2007-11-23 08:41:52 · answer #9 · answered by Agent Zero® 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because its a fake according to this guy...
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ap0KaC0Ew6kbRXnWG4sKr7MtLxV.;_ylv=3?qid=20071123131905AAnJ855
2007-11-23 09:18:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋