Do the people have the right to know if a Lesbian is running for President? Or for that matter a gay man?
Obviously, a great number of voters reject homosexuals as their Representatives and Senators. In fact, Wisconsin and Massachusetts are the only states which have had an openly homosexual Representative.
2007-11-23
06:53:20
·
26 answers
·
asked by
plezurgui
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
A bunch of you Libs jumped all over my Question accusing me of some smear. I never said that Hillary was a Lesbian. I still think that a homosexual would find it impossible to be elected President. It doesn't matter whether that person is Hillary Clinton, Larry Craig, or John Edwards. The only way one can get elected to the White House is to hide in the closet or in the Lincoln bedroom with a young actress.
2007-11-23
08:59:24 ·
update #1
I do not like Hillary because she approves of abortion, illegal immigration - she thinks we are not smart enough to raise our own kids so the gov't. has to do it.........her socialistic and communistic ties and aspirations........but her sex life has nothing to do with her electibility, nor should it.
2007-11-23 07:40:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is no issue. Because malcontents who hate her will grab onto anything, even as patently ridiculous as suggesting she's a lesbian, doesn't mean reasonable people will pay attention to their slander. She's one tough strong woman with a backbone of steel, she MUST be a lesbian lol. Thank God most people in this country are not idiots who have to invent smear garbage to reject or support a candidate for office.
EDIT: Oh come off it. You say in your additional details that you are not accusing Hillary of being a lesbian. No, you just use the example of her when asking if we should talk about sexual orientation. Since none of the Presidential candidates are homosexual or have even been seriously rumored to be a homosexual, then what is the purpose of asking this question at all other than to flame? Sorry, but you really aren't fooling anyone, your transparent bias is crystal clear, as is your intent by asking this question to begin with.
2007-11-23 15:32:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
So Hillary is a lesbian now? Sounds like a Hannity or a Glen Beck 'exclusive'. That's the best the neo-cons can come up with? It's disappointing.
2007-11-23 16:18:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
You are behaving like the school-yard bully... calling the other kids names if they refuse to call kids names with you...
"If you won't say that billy is a F*G then you must be one too... so na na na na boo boo"
It's beyond pathetic.
I'll star this question to show you that reasonable people outnumber Bullies these days.
Your kind of politics is EXACTLY why she might win the election, you know.
2007-11-23 15:16:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by rabble rouser 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well, we certainly can not assume that Bill and Hillary have a good marriage. No family values there.
Therefore she is either asexual or a lesbian.
2007-11-23 15:12:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Fred Head 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Not sure about that, but there was a TV deal about some actor banging on the bathroom stall and hollering and when Tommy Lee came out he smacked him. Do you remember the actor? they was funny. Take care.
2007-11-23 15:21:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by R J 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
That's wrong with the world. They feed too much on ignorance! The 'Bible' said it is immoral for the same sex to engage in sexual liaisons; supremacists specify it is immoral to engage in interracial relationships, etc.
Regardless who is who, sexual orientation should be the least concern. Again, ignorance has no boundaries.
2007-11-23 15:08:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by flying hi 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
Definitely not. My only concern would be the number of flip-flops she owns.
2007-11-23 15:08:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by neonman 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Should not be an issue. Although I loathe the very air she breathes, she has the right to diddle whomever she pleases as long as they are consenting individuals of legal age. This should be about her positions concerning legitimate issues, not mud raking horsecrap. That's her right, and though she will try to take some of mine, I must defend ALL of hers, or I'm just as horrible as she is.
2007-11-23 15:02:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Freethinker 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
As Janet Reno.
2007-11-23 16:25:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by iraqisax 6
·
1⤊
2⤋