English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He is a strong leader and stuck to his guns while the world doubted his policy to invade countries,kill their leaders and convert them all to christianity.
Now that the war in Iraq is won except for mopping up a few lose evil doers here and there I think he will. The world owes the man a debt of gratitude.
When he nukes Iran next year,the world will be sorry they messed with the the leader of democracy and freedom !
Death to the evil doers worldwide.Long live the forces of freedom,truth,justice and the American way.

2007-11-23 06:32:28 · 11 answers · asked by TD1HOGY2K 1 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Amen TD1HOGY2K!

God Bless GWB!!!

2007-11-23 06:37:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

IRAQ IS WON? HOW CAN ANY IDIO--wait. I can't write that online. There is no way out, there is a Sunni-Shiite civil war, the elections were a disaster, we proved to the world that our military force is a hasbeen, and you STILL think that Bush is good? P.S. Bush is the least articulate person ever to be elected for anything governmental.
Also, we have no nukes. You misinterpreted "Iran has nukes and wants to bomb America" as "America has nukes and wants to bomb Iran."
Lastly, "Truth, Justice, and the American Way" is Superman's line. How old are you? I thought you had to be 13 to use this.

2007-11-23 06:43:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

No. Why would a lame duck president be named man of the year, when in 2007 he has been mostly irrelevant except for when he has vetoed or blocked progressive legislation?

2007-11-23 06:55:14 · answer #3 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 3 0

The Russians did no longer do lots for usa under Bush, and that i do no longer think of they are going to do lots for usa under Obama the two. whilst i think of returned, the only time I undergo in strategies that the Russians and individuals cooperated grew to become into for some years (under Bush41) whilst the U.S. merely dissolved and the U. S. grew to become into assisting the former soviets look after their WMDs. consistent with probability I could remind you that Reagan did no longer get alongside too nicely with the U.S., noted as them an "Evil Empire", and tangled with them regularly, and nonetheless controlled to barter quite lots from them. do no longer study too lots into this yet. that's the international family members interest--a majority of those stunts and posturing are actually commonplace and are many times area of the negotiation. If Putin needs Obama to come returned to Russia to make certain him, Obama needs something. I doubt that he expects a million/2 of what grew to become into on his press secretary's checklist of issues incorrect with Russia to be fastened till now he would bypass to a gathering, yet that's no longer the component. in case you do no longer practice capability on an identical time as negotiating, you haven't any longer any thank you to barter.

2016-12-10 04:12:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

George Bush can not run again as he has given this country two full terms. We (the people} are electing a New President.

2007-11-23 06:40:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Oh yeah, with Al Sharpton a close second. He might win it on Rush Limbaugh's show, except that arrogant fat bastard would vote for himself.

2007-11-23 06:42:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Nice try but your sarcasm is too obvious. But I did sort of like your Hitlerian portrait of Bush, securing the supremacy of the American Master Race.

Work on it, tone it down a bit, and more people will bite on your troll.

2007-11-23 06:36:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Stephen Colbert, everybody. Give him a hand.

2007-11-23 06:35:39 · answer #8 · answered by Buying is Voting 7 · 2 2

No. He doesnt really deserve it although I am not an opponent or supporter of President Bush.

Besides, if Gore can receive a Nobel Prize, then my faith in all of these types of awards is nonexistent.

2007-11-23 06:37:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

Why Not if Time could pick Hitler I guess anyone could get get picked.

2007-11-23 06:36:20 · answer #10 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers