Will that last confused segment of wannabe conservatives that still supports Bush label McClellen a traitor for telling the truth about the illegal outing of a CIA agent? some silly people called Powell a traitor for admitting that Bush new the yellowcake story was a fraud, BEFORE he used it in the State of the Union Address. They also labeled Tenant a traitor for exposing the cherry picking of intelligence before the Iraq war. McClellen did what was right for America, and should be a hero. WIl some of you embarrass yourselves and label him a traitor?
2007-11-23 02:29:09 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The Secretary of the Treasury was a traitor for pointing out the war in Iraq would cost more than a few hundred million (he was right), Deputy Director of Intelligence Clark was a traitor for pointing out intel manipulation (he was right), Army generals were traitors for pointing out we had too few troops in Iraq (they were right)...damn, I'm starting to notice a pattern...
2007-11-23 02:36:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 2⤋
Considering what a smarmy little weazel he used to be when he was Bushie's pet, Scott has come a long way! Far from a traitor (although Bushies would like us to think anyone calling attention to the crimes of the neo-cons are just that), he may turn out to be a hero.
2007-11-23 10:36:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 1⤋
I knew it would be just a matter of time before people began calling McClellen a traitor.
Why is it ok for Bush to lie, cheat and deceive the country for 7 years but when someone comes out and tells the truth, they're traitors? Geez, people need to pull their heads out of the sand and face the truth about our president.
It's not like he's the first person who worked for Bush and told it like it was.
2007-11-23 10:34:23 · answer #3 · answered by katydid 7 · 8⤊ 2⤋
How about you read the book before you start indirectly quoting it? Then you can try something called critical thought.
It's clear reading through this thread, that liberals have long doubted the character of this Scott McClellan, but suddenly, when there's the perception that he said something you wanted to hear, you've anointed him with oil. Seems contradictory to me, that anyone who opposes you is scum, but as soon as they make an inkling of saying what you want to hear, whether its founded or not, you adopt them as a strong ally.
2007-11-23 10:47:12 · answer #4 · answered by DOOM 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
he is not a traitor, hes a good american. now the people in command who outed a cia agent? that is traitorist.
2007-11-23 10:51:52 · answer #5 · answered by smarternow 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's like the little boy who said, "The emperor has no clothes" only he's not even the first to say that.
How many ex-BushCO employees have to speak out for the neo-cons to believe them?
2007-11-23 10:52:26 · answer #6 · answered by catrionn 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
sounds more like he is just trying to paint everything as Bush being misled. poor poor Bush, can't think on his own, and was the victim of the evil advisors.
Who is running this government again??!
2007-11-23 10:41:31 · answer #7 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
They will say its a lie to sell books. Same as they always do.
2007-11-23 10:36:44 · answer #8 · answered by justa 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
The truth shall set you free....
2007-11-23 10:33:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
Only to neo-cons. Neo-cons consider Valerie Plame to be a traitor and blame her for Cheney's decision to expose her and blow her cover to the public.
2007-11-23 10:34:12 · answer #10 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 9⤊ 5⤋