And get this pointless war over with. The terrorists bombed us so why not bomb them back. Plus we are getting rid of future insurgents and hidden enemy bases. There are more terrorists then innocent people. Also to lower the innocent body count. Evacuate as many as troops can in 48 hours, then nuke.
What do you think?
2007-11-22 16:34:32 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
nah, save it for iran
2007-11-22 16:40:28 · answer #1 · answered by 1080 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
to get at the terrorist, we would have to bomb saudia arabia, since thats where the terrorist originated from...but wait.....were friends with the saudi's.....hhhmmmmm.
let's shift the blame to iraq, we will call the people defending thier country Insurgents and label them terrorist while were at it to legitimize it and really confuse everyone, we'll muster up opposition between factions in iraq and call it civil war, and tell everyone if we leave, there will be utter instability........ok..ok. Iraq's not the enemy...our foreign policy is the enemy, as the cia reported in the 9-11 commission report, it would make no sense to nuke anyone, the only thing getting nuked is our civil liberties , I pray Ron Paul gets elected and saves our remaining hero's by pulling them out before these Liberal's and neocons entangle us any further in foreign wars. our soldier's can serve us best by protecting our own borders and airspace.
2007-11-23 01:00:41 · answer #2 · answered by Al 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, if the US uses a nuke, they'll produce more enemies than they have now.
Second, the US is binded by peace treaties; withholding the use of Nukes as an offensive.
Third, Iraq holds one of the largest oil reserves in the world. Wouldn't it be a waste to just destroy those resources?
Fourth, if a Nuke is used, then Iran, Syria, North Korea and many more countries will finally have the reason to develop or continue making their own nukes.
Finally, NUCLEAR ARMS ARE BAD BECAUSE YOU CAN'T HUG CHILDREN WITH NUCLEAR ARMS!!!!
2007-11-23 00:39:39 · answer #3 · answered by James 3 · 7⤊ 0⤋
You are a prime example of why the rest of the world hates Americans.
No Iraqis have ever bombed the USA. Even that numbskull Bush had to admit that.
And do you really think that you can nuke Iraq without the fallout affecting American children?
If so you are dumber than you sound
2007-11-23 01:52:46 · answer #4 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
save the Iraqis by killing all of them?
and you're whole "there are more terorists there than civilians" doesn't seem to be rooted in truth, as defense department estimates around 30,000 insuragents, 1,500 foriegn terrorists our of a nation of millions...and also, 9-11 didn't have any Iraqi links according to the 9-11 report?
add on to all of that the fact that saudi is right there, israel isn't far away, and China and India would also see some of it... what do you say to them when the radioactive rain starts falling on them....
2007-11-23 00:43:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Crazy, CRAZY! Who are we evacuating? Get rid of insurgents by leaving. Why wouldn't a country attack us with nuclear weapons. We should value life just a bit.
2007-11-23 00:40:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
why don't you tell us why we are there in the first place???
is it because Saddam was a thorn in Israels side or ?? he certainly was not a danger to the world nor America as they claimed when they went into Iraq, so in essence we are fighting a war for Israel, now don't you feel better, since no Israelis are hurt or dead? only brave young Americans have spilth any blood ,,
2007-11-23 00:55:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nuclear fallout gets in our atmosphere and effects the entire planet, especially of countries and oceans in that particular latitude. Nukes aren't needed in Iraq and should only be used as an absolute last resort. Hopefully never, for humanity's sake.
2007-11-23 00:39:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Who or what is your source of information? Why do you want to ruin Dubya's source of profits? Isn't the war about freedom, democracy, bla bla bla.
2007-11-23 02:07:02 · answer #9 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Iraq did not attack you - no one from Iraq attacked you - they were mostly Saudis?
Because US is - or used to be - the beacon of hope and light to the rest of the world?
2007-11-23 00:49:37 · answer #10 · answered by gortamor 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Because that would have destroyed the oil wells that our troops are guarding.
2007-11-23 01:42:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋