i would like to see a woman be in office, or the first black person, because they have a good campain,. i also think i would want one of them because they are goiong to make a statement that you can do anything you want, nomatter who you are what color or what gender you are you can make a difference. who would you choose, think about this one, the best answer will be awarded as many points as possible!
2007-11-22 13:22:57 · 10 answers · asked by volleyballplaya72 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Ron Paul.
Dennis Kucinich.
These two guys from "opposite" side of the political spectrum both:
a) are not owned by corporations
b) have uncommon integrity
c) would get the US out of Iraq very quickly
d) respect and are familiar with what the constitution says
e) appreciate some of the real dangers we have placed ourselves in
Tilting at windmills? Maybe. But if we agree there is no point then it is the corporations and corporate media who have picked the next prez and her name is Hillary, Inc.
2007-11-22 13:52:00 · answer #1 · answered by WikiJo 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would not have a problem with a Woman or a Black president. However, I do have a problem with it if it is based on race or gender alone. If the person is qualified and appeals to me as a person who can lead a nation and believes what or similar to what I believe then I would vote for him. You have to understand something, that it is not the issue of what a person is, but rather what a person does or what a person believes that would make him or her a great leader and that is what I want for a president, a person with a vision, with character, with firm conservative beliefs, and one who will make America great once again. That is why I believe that Huckabee would make a good president.
2007-11-22 14:22:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anime_Warrior 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't have a problem with a women president, I just have a problem with Hillary as our president, she's not worthy of holding the highest office in the land with all the scandals that surround her long before her bid for her senate seat, she a member of the councel on foreign relations, and all her endorsements are coming from other members of the CFR including the media...the CFR has plenty of freelance writers writing cushy articles for Hillary, Obama, Romney, Giuliani and McCain giving plenty of media attention and the only non member who against the CFR's influence on trade deals, foreign policy is Ron Paul as far as I know, not sure on Huckabee, I think Paul is the real deal, I've read his voting record(flawless, if you follow the constitution) does not pander to the voter to be a flip flopper (up front honest) loves his country (military doctor) , he's too good to be true in this day and age.
age is not important, reagan was older.
we need someone who will bring real dignity to the job without playing on everyone's fears of terrorism, this country is more than capable of fighting terror without a loss to our liberties.
2007-11-22 13:54:20 · answer #3 · answered by Al 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You know what I want. I want a candidate that can inspire a nation. One that cares little about special interests and has the nation's and its people's best interests at heart.
Someone who can look at the impending energy crisis, the issues that are important, etc. And who is not pandering to the special interest groups.
Otherwise, I don't care whether the candidate is a man, a woman, a hermaphrodite, a mulatto, or a space alien.
Therefore, none of the candidates appeal to me.
2007-11-22 13:30:02 · answer #4 · answered by krollohare2 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Dear, God, I pray you aren't old enough to vote. You would actually vote for someone just because they had a 'good campaign'?? What about socialized medicine, twenty percent increase in taxes, open borders, gutting our military, cowering before those who seek to destroy us? If this doesn't sound familiar then you slept through the eight years Bill Clinton and his skank wife were president(s). Go ahead and vote for someone whose middle name is Hussein and was raised Muslim or that power-mad, compulsive liar that wants to hurl our nation into total socialism if you want. Hope you like wearing a burka....
2007-11-22 13:36:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Pretty weak reasons to vote for someone who will really mess up half the world.
But amoung all the candidates currently I have to think about Jeff Dunham's Friend Walter.
I think he's probably the best going at the moment.
2007-11-22 13:33:55 · answer #6 · answered by SFC_Ollie 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd rather not vote for someone just because they're making a statement. I'd like to vote for someone because I agree with their policies and character. That's why I'm voting for Huckabee.
2007-11-22 13:50:36 · answer #7 · answered by TBEau 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Homer Simpson
2007-11-22 13:31:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
you're ignorant.
You're country has invaded another continent... illegally... the rest of the world is on edge... and you decide this would be the perfect time to MAKE A STATEMENT!!!!
COME ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Take world events a little more seriously.... the polls show that Obama has a VERY good chance of winning, so your 'statement' has been made.
It's time to look at our candidates like Politicians, and find out who is going to fix the many messes we are currently in.
2007-11-22 13:30:21 · answer #9 · answered by AckDuScheisse!! 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Ron Paul is acceptable. I'm not white, and I'm voting for him because he really does have a campaign that means real things.
2007-11-22 13:42:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋