I was almost on board with Hillary until I started doing some research on her over the last year, I'm absolutley convinced people are misinformed about her.
If Bill clinton was not a former president, no one would have given Hillary a glance at a senate seat (She's not even from NY) , let alone a presidential seat in the whitehouse.
I don't think her allegiance is to Bush, but Hillary and Bush both have allegiances to the Councel On Foreign relations and their Agenda's on international affairs, and just to let you know where the common elements are between Democrates and Republicans, just read a document called " Building a North American Community" on the Councel on Foreign relations web site...www.cfr.org and you'll see the transparency between the two parties and that all 2008 presidential candidates are member's of the CFR with the exception of Congressman Ron Paul, so basically it comes down too this .....if Ron Paul does not win the primaries and the whitehouse, your guarenteed too see a North American Union, a new currency, and a new set of laws governed by the united nations.....this is all stated in the report...read it for yourself. Most major journalist are freelance writer's for the CFR and are also members, that's why they thrust their candidate with cushy write ups. they write stories to drum up a common viewpoint on why we should support certain issues and they help elevate the candidate that is gaining the most popularity, unless it's not one of their player's like( RON PAUL )...we are blind to the train wreck happening before our eyes?. is 2008 the year the U.S. looses it's Soverienty? I hope not.
I was a registered democrate, but i'm crossing the line to save my country and voting for Ron Paul in 2008.
2007-11-22 16:35:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Al 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Misinformed. There are some who look at her & think, it's time for a woman to become President, never mind that she may not be the best person, just that she is a woman. Others think that because she has largest amount of money to run her campaign means that she must be the best canditate, never mind where she got that money, they don't even question who her contributors are, just follow the money. Then you have those who will never vote for a black person, not because they are racist, noooo, never that, he is not experienced is the reason they give. At last we come to the last front runner & they can't come up with a reason for not wanting him except, that he has a lot of money, gets $400 hair cuts & has a large home! Now that must mean that Hillary & Obama must never try to look good going before an audience, they live in mud huts & are poor people!
Oh, yes, & he made a lot of money being a lawyer & investing in the stock market. All three are lawyers, I'll make a bet that all three have made money on the stock market etc... The only difference between the three is in their platform. People are misinformed because they don't listen to what each candidate is saying. They don't make note of the changes each candidate, except one, has made in their platorm since this run for the Presidency started. That one man, the one who has stood firm in his convictions, some of which I don't happen to like too well, but he laid it on the line for us & in my estimation, he is the one who will get my vote because we know exactly what he stands for & that means a lot to me. Now you figure out who he is, O.K.?
2007-11-22 13:02:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by geegee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
what allegiance?you didnt show a connection in your statement.George Bush does not have a policy,it might be Dick Cheney's or someone else.please dont start accusing Bush of having ideas ,thats a pipe dream.I must admit that im misinformed on this issue,you didnt inform me ,are you keeping it a secret?
2007-11-22 12:37:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by cantonbound 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hmmm a Democrat turned anti Hillary, something new. Obama, I am guessing?
2007-11-22 12:47:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the Democrats want to choose a Candidate that will beat the Republicans.
She is well financed, and has the necessary tenacity to defeat any of the Republican Candidates.
It literally comes down to the lesser of two evils.
2007-11-22 12:35:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Spoken like a true Obama fan
2007-11-22 12:25:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
She does not have an alliegience to Bush's policies or anything for that matter as she is only saying whatever she can to get votes.
2007-11-22 12:25:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anime_Warrior 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
i might desire to confess which you look the essential liberal; the form i presumed all liberals have been like earlier I have been given on YA. a guy who can surely communicate and who admits that he must be too jaded to look them the two needless to say. Wow! perchance you may desire to run. shall we use a guy such as you. i could might desire to think of with regard to the respond and come back to you.
2016-09-30 00:37:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by coughlan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think it is as much a matter of being misinformed, as it is being informed of the alternative.
2007-11-22 13:11:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
everyone sees the information out there and is up to them to look for the truth ,it is out there ...some arrange the info to fit their need at a point in time .they leave out some of the content so it sounds like what they (t.v,papers,and internet)want you to believe.....just do some searching.and make a good call.....just vote for the one you think stands for what you believe.....good luck
2007-11-22 12:38:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by buzzy70a 2
·
0⤊
1⤋