Who thinks having a one world government is a good idea.?

Question

A one world government, a one world currency, a one world credit system, a one world policing system and a one world place of worship.

Answer 1

Decoding your whole entire Question here:

--"A one world government," that would heavily depend on the government in place, wouldn't it? *If* this government had open, free elections with *multiple* political parties to represent all of the people....and *ONLY if* this government *Respected* the Four Freedoms as enunciated by Franklin D. Roosevelt (in short: Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Worship, Freedom from Want and Freedom from Fear of War), would I consider going along with this...

--"a one world currency," We are fast approaching this point, and I doubt it's going to be good for most people. Simply put, this would have the effect of encoding the Chase To The Bottom into law by way of currency. Meaning, the "one world currency" would have more in common with the coin and paper minted in Developing Nations, like in Africa, than it would with the currency in the Developed Nations like those of Western Europe or North America (US & Canada mainly).

It would be worth damned near nothing. Consider, that a *single* Japanese Yen is worth a bit less than a penny. Most of the coin and paper money in Japan is in the 100s to 1,000s of Yen.

That is the situation that could happen to the U.S. dollar under a "one world currency": the only difference would be, instead of it just being a numbers game, a U.S. dollar would end up *actually buying less* than what a penny once could. Purchasing power would simply cease to exist for most non-CEO, non-billionaire people. Physical currency would mean nothing.

--"a one world credit system," This is where it gets interesting, because this is what the CEOs and Billionaires would have to do to *maintain* their wealth. In the face of physical currency being worthless, the only alternative is to go electronic, 100%, and make bits and bytes the new standard.

Again, this is happening faster than what you might think. We have the technology to go cashless, the only problem is, that pesky *physical currency* is still worth something.

Trust me on this, the combination of the "one world currency" being worthless, and the "one world credit system" being what protects the richest of the rich, this is what ends up separating humanity into dirt-poor, Morlock slaves, and filthy rich, elitist Eloi (keyword search: "H.G. Wells", "The Time Machine", whole phrases, quotes and all).

Why is this so? Don't even look into bankruptcy laws here in the States, they aren't the real clue. The real clue is *African debt*. Under a "one world credit system", the debts of Africa, a whole continent of near-unrelenting poverty and misery, end up driving *all* working people into the gutter, on average.

--"a one world policing system," And here is the single BIGGEST warning sign that it's going to hit the fan. The people who want to inflict this "oneness" upon us, they'd need a single *massively overpowered* professional military to back them up, right? And failing that, they would then also need a clique of *massively amoral* privateers, mercenaries for hire to do what the military doesn't.

The people who want this inflicted on us are the Billionaires. The massively overpowered professional armies *are* the U.S. Armed Forces, have been working up to this since Reagan got rid of the former Soviet competiton. And Blackwater and their *ilk* are likewise the ruthless, cutthroat Plan B.

It's in place. All these people need is a) an excuse to dominate everyone, every last man, woman, child and basset hound *everywhere*, and b) the prison capacity to contain and eventually *butcher* those who dare resist, or even speak against the regime. And some would say the *prison structure* is being built as we speak. O_O

And finally....

--" one world place of worship." *This* was likely the plan all along. Monopolize all faith, all hope, all charity, until it becomes all *irrelevant* in the face of the One World Corporate Leviathan and Its Virtual Money, Neverending Debt, and Virtual Enslavement.

Does it sound paranoid? Yes. But....can you describe to me *any* organized religion on the face of this earth that *does NOT* have its violent, fanatic elements who would just as soon *conquer the world* given funding, arms and support? Consider:

1) Christianity has their Evangelical Dominionism,
2) Judaism has Israelite Zionism,
3) Islam has Arabist Wahabbi-ism,
4) Buddhists and Hinduists have Radical Rammism,

And it goes on and on. *Every* mainstream religion on the planet either *has* fundamental, fanatic elements that *have* hijacked the mainstream faith, or *has* fundamental, fanatic elements who *want to* hijack the mainstream faith. And to what end?

Absolute, dictatorial domination...that "one world place of worship" where *everyone* has to Bow Their Heads Or DIE.

And if they don't get what they "want"? They'll try to bring about the End of the World, in accordance to their prophecies. And be clear on this: This is the behavior of *People*, not an Act of God. This is about *people* acting up and killing each other. Murdering each other to try to inflict an Armageddon upon the Earth *way* before its time. Butchering each other over *flock politics*, over *insect politics* really.

"Bow Your Heads According to OUR Dictates, or DIE", they say, not realizing that Faith doesn't work that way, it can't exist where there is no *free will* or choice.

So....while world peace and prosperity are noble goals to pursue and hope for...No, I DO NOT think this is a good idea.

Thanks for your time.

Answer 2

I think it's a horrible idea. Government works best on the local level when the elected officials are in direct contact with the people affected by their decisions. Higher levels of government should only be involved with issues that are larger than the next smallest division of government.

I do think there is a need for a global body to deal with issues that affect everyone - and that's what we have the United Nations for.

A global currency may have some merit - especially for poor nations.

Answer 3

it;s not a good idea.not to mention it would;nt work.there will always be some kind of nut case that will want that power for himself.leading to over throw of the government.war and death and destruction.we;ll never see it as a human way of life.every empire in the history of the world tried doing the same thing.it;s not meant to be.i believe some day there will be a one world government but not under man rule. it;ll be from above.man is to filled with pride not to mention liers and war mongers.cheaters,and just plain corrupt.

Answer 4

properly we wouldnt might desire to complication approximately citizenship or "international" crossing borders... yet lou dobbs does not have a teach then. it may be exciting because of the fact the borders and territories of the international are drawn up via governments and human beings. we would all be one yet on an identical time the government could be great corrupt. on account that that's a hypothetical question, i think of it may basically be a good concept to have a one international government if we've been invaded via extraterrestrial beings from yet another planet. it may then be human beings vs. extraterrestrial beings.

Answer 5

Local governments need to be strong; these governments will best serve their constituents. They'll speak the same language, culture, geography, etc.

A oneworld government would only function as a confederation of states. There is too much autonomy in the world.

But i think it's a good idea, althogh you might think my reason is a bit quarky:

If the aliens attack us we need to be unified. That's it!

Answer 6

Usually people who need to have "gotten out" more somewhere along in their life experience. It would be pleasant to hear from the Diplomats in regard to this topic--they have adequate as well as respectable relations with persons from different parts of the world, with basically no other interests that may conflict.

Answer 7

yea lets give our lives over to a government that will have a monoploy on money, who gets it who doesn't, monopoly on policing answering to no one but corrupt people who chould care less about rule of law or justice, lets get rid of all checks and balances (oh yea that doesn't work that well either). and gets to decide what relgion you have or belief system you will follow, (of course the united nations people are so altrustic they would never impose worship of themselves) they could use a one world military to speed up tyranny and suppression of human rights and dignity deciding who lives, eats, sleeps who get recreation or vacation and who gets property and who doesn't. do you really trust corrupt selfish people in the united nations who are not elected for that?

RRRRR

Answer 8

That is going to take a lot a change to happen and isn't likely in the next millenium. There are simply too many differences between cultures, nationalities and individuals.

Answer 9

Never going to happen and if it does, the only way to get there would be to wage war on the poeple who didn't want to join and force them to.

Answer 10

I may sounds like a good idea but would be much to difficult to achieve.