That's a really good question - it is obviously going to be very subjective since it will be based on what people believe will be the best policy makers.
Hillary is far too idealistic and unrealistic for my personal tastes and, the more I hear from her opponents, I'm somewhat leaning toward the same conclusion concerning the other Democratic candidates. It appears that the far left loonies have finally started to infiltrate the mainstream Democrats, and that's a damned shame.
On the Republican side, I think the jury is still out on this one - too early to call and perhaps not all of the candidates have thrown their hat into the ring as yet.
2007-11-22 04:25:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sensible to whom? The Democrats are sensible to the poor working class. The Republicans are sensible to the rich, and recently the christian fundamentalists, though they are waking up.
2007-11-22 12:33:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by phil8656 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul
2007-11-22 12:50:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sadly neither party is very good. Hillary is to far to the left and Obarma says nothing so no one knows about him. Rudy is to liberal and Mitt ends up the best of a very bad group.All the rest have know chance of getting the nomination. Peace
2007-11-22 11:58:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by PARVFAN 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
The Keg Party?
2007-11-22 11:55:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by motheroftwo 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hillary Clinton is the only sensible one out of all of them.
2007-11-22 12:17:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by The Wiz 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
on the democrat side John Edwards is the most sensible.on the republican side Giuliani i guess.
2007-11-22 11:59:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by bigjon5555 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
RON PAUL
2007-11-22 12:05:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by John 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am ...Listen to me
2007-11-22 11:50:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by charlie s 5
·
1⤊
2⤋