what a loser switching to tna
2007-11-21 15:03:25 · 20 answers · asked by HArdyBOYZ1fan 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
second rate wrestler to second rate promotion :D
2007-11-21 15:29:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
Well if Booker T is a traitor then so is most of the older wrestlers in the WWE. HHH is a traitor, Chris Benoit was a traitor, along with Eddie Guerrero and many others. All once worked for WCW and left them for the WWE. Its the same thing. Booker will be great for TNA.
The fact that people say Booker sucked in the last year or so for the WWE is NOT his fault. It is 100% the fault of WWE management. Wrestlers are only as good as some of the management let them be. Bad story lines and gimmicks are not something you can blame the wrestlers on. Blame Stephanie McMahon and other people on the writing team for that.
2007-11-21 16:04:48 · answer #2 · answered by komets.geo 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't say he's a traitor, but we know he had to be taking steroids for sure now. The best thing to come out of all of it is he's not King Booker anymore. It would be perfect if TNA had put it in Booker's contract that his wife could never be on TV. Personally as soon as he started having her come out with him is when I lost any of my appeciation for Booker.
2007-11-21 16:17:03 · answer #3 · answered by Phil D 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I hate TNA but if I were Booker I would have switched too. Besides how is he a traitor? He only wrestled for Vince because Vince bought WCW and Booker knew that there was nowhere else for him to go. Maybe he thinks TNA do what WCW couldn't do.....defeat the almighty Vincent Kennedy McMahon.
2007-11-21 15:30:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wwe is the traitor they ruined the 5 time 5 time 5 time 5 time 5 time wcw champion hopefull when wwe get him back they keep the booker t gimmick.
2007-11-21 16:17:45 · answer #5 · answered by Bob Bobson 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i wouldn't say so. i think that his life in tna would probably be better. they don't care if you do steroids over there. lol. Plus, going back to Booker T, after being King Booker, really is for the better. i really don't care because i didn't find him that interesting in wwe (recently) and i hardly watch tna so i won't have to see him that much.
2007-11-21 16:20:40 · answer #6 · answered by tygreen77 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I won't say Obama is a traitor. i think of he's an opportunist and could bypass with the flow. the consequence could desire to be the comparable, however the objective isn't. Obama is getting roundly criticized for moving in direction of the middle on various subject concerns. i think of he's conversing center yet staying left. He believes what standard McArthur mentioned approximately there being no exchange for victory in conflict, and he's in a political conflict. yet wars are gained via the resolute, not the indecisive. he's scuffling with on all fronts and he's working out of gas.
2017-01-05 23:23:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Disagreed.
Booker T was being held down ever since his last title reign ended. Matter fact, he was held down before he added the "King" gimmick a lot of people hate. He made a smart move by leaving WWE, but I don't think he'll wrestle for a long time in TNA.
2007-11-21 15:17:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I have to defend booker here. There's no way in hell I'd stay in the wwe if i got forced into the king booker gimmick.
2007-11-21 16:10:18 · answer #9 · answered by Kenny H 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, your totally wrong, booker T is way better off on TNA. The WWE was giving him a terrible character...they ruined him! booker T wasnt that great anyway...so why does it matter?
2007-11-21 15:30:38 · answer #10 · answered by Triple h** fan 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If hes a traitor then so are Kurt Angle, Christian, Rhyno, Dudley Boyz and countless others. I heard no one call Monty Brown or CM Punk traitors when they came to WWE
2007-11-21 15:07:24 · answer #11 · answered by Artist Formally Known As Muse06 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋