delivered by USPS until 2 1/2 weeks after it arrived to the destination city?
I'm also being charged a finance charge (whatever that is) along with the late fee, whereas before when the payments were on time there were no finance charges.
I have made a claim for the late fee but the person I talked with said I would have to pay the finance charge, which I'm thinking is because of the "late" payment.
I don't think I need to pay for the late fee or the additional finance charge because of USPS not delivering the payment within a reasonable time frame. The person I talked with said they have no control over what USPS does. Given that train of thought I shouldn't have to pay because I have no control of what USPS does either.
What do you think?
2007-11-21
14:03:46
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Elbert
7
in
Business & Finance
➔ Other - Business & Finance
Well that pretty much sucks.
The payment arrived at the destination city 1 week before the deadline. Why do I have to pay for something that is out of my hands?
That's what gets me.
2007-11-21
15:05:54 ·
update #1
It's not my fault that it didn't get there on time and I'm being charged for something that is definitely not my doing. LOL that's messed up.
2007-11-21
15:09:50 ·
update #2